[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200110173823.GQ2844@hirez.programming.kicks-ass.net>
Date: Fri, 10 Jan 2020 18:38:23 +0100
From: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>
To: Kim Phillips <kim.phillips@....com>
Cc: Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Janakarajan Natarajan <Janakarajan.Natarajan@....com>,
Suravee Suthikulpanit <suravee.suthikulpanit@....com>,
Tom Lendacky <thomas.lendacky@....com>,
Stephane Eranian <eranian@...gle.com>,
Martin Liška <mliska@...e.cz>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 2/2] perf/x86/amd: Add support for Large Increment per
Cycle Events
On Fri, Jan 10, 2020 at 10:22:10AM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> On 1/10/20 9:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 04:26:47PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >> On 12/20/19 6:09 AM, Peter Zijlstra wrote:
> >>> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 12:37:20PM -0600, Kim Phillips wrote:
> >> One problem I see with your change in the "not already used" fastpath
> >> area, is that the new mask variable gets updated with position 'i'
> >> regardless of any previous Large Increment event assignments.
> >
> > Urgh, I completely messed that up. Find the below delta (I'll push out a
> > new version to queue.git as well).
>
> OK, I tested what you pushed on your perf/amd branch, and it passes all my tests.
Excellent!
> BTW, a large part of the commit message went missing, hopefully it'll be brought back before being pushed further upstream?
Argh.. it's those ---- lines, my script things they're cuts. I'll go
fix it up.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists