[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200111094927.093723511@linuxfoundation.org>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 10:49:50 +0100
From: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
stable@...r.kernel.org, Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>,
Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
Subject: [PATCH 5.4 071/165] pinctrl: pinmux: fix a possible null pointer in pinmux_can_be_used_for_gpio
From: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
[ Upstream commit 6ba2fd391ac58c1a26874f10c3054a1ea4aca2d0 ]
This commit adds a check on ops pointer to avoid a kernel panic when
ops->strict is used. Indeed, on some pinctrl driver (at least for
pinctrl-stmfx) the pinmux ops is not implemented. Let's assume than gpio
can be used in this case.
Fixes: 472a61e777fe ("pinctrl/gpio: Take MUX usage into account")
Signed-off-by: Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191204144106.10876-1-alexandre.torgue@st.com
Signed-off-by: Linus Walleij <linus.walleij@...aro.org>
Signed-off-by: Sasha Levin <sashal@...nel.org>
---
drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
index e914f6efd39e..9503ddf2edc7 100644
--- a/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
+++ b/drivers/pinctrl/pinmux.c
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@ bool pinmux_can_be_used_for_gpio(struct pinctrl_dev *pctldev, unsigned pin)
const struct pinmux_ops *ops = pctldev->desc->pmxops;
/* Can't inspect pin, assume it can be used */
- if (!desc)
+ if (!desc || !ops)
return true;
if (ops->strict && desc->mux_usecount)
--
2.20.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists