[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <565353ce-9383-9af6-3150-529e9ef73398@roeck-us.net>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 12:10:11 -0800
From: Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
To: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/84] 4.19.95-stable review
On 1/11/20 9:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
>> On 1/11/20 1:49 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
>>> This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.95 release.
>>> There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
>>> to this one. If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
>>> let me know.
>>>
>>> Responses should be made by Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:46:17 +0000.
>>> Anything received after that time might be too late.
>>>
>> Build results:
>> total: 156 pass: 154 fail: 2
>> Failed builds:
>> arm64:defconfig
>> arm64:allmodconfig
>> Qemu test results:
>> total: 382 pass: 339 fail: 43
>> Failed tests:
>> <all arm64>
>>
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c: In function 'handle_tx2_tvm':
>> arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c:438:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__kvm_skip_instr'; did you mean 'kvm_skip_instr'?
>
> Thanks for this, I'll go push out a -rc2 with the offending patch
> removed.
>
For v4.19.94-84-g4f77fc728c70:
Build results:
total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
Qemu test results:
total: 382 pass: 382 fail: 0
Guenter
Powered by blists - more mailing lists