[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <c64b6f61-f523-dc8a-2abc-b0e9a8cd2d98@web.de>
Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 09:03:49 +0100
From: Markus Elfring <Markus.Elfring@....de>
To: Julia Lawall <julia.lawall@...ia.fr>,
Wen Yang <wenyang@...ux.alibaba.com>, cocci@...teme.lip6.fr
Cc: kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Gilles Muller <Gilles.Muller@...6.fr>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Masahiro Yamada <yamada.masahiro@...ionext.com>,
Matthias Männich <maennich@...gle.com>,
Michal Marek <michal.lkml@...kovi.net>,
Nicolas Palix <nicolas.palix@...g.fr>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>
Subject: Re: [v3] coccinelle: semantic patch to check for inappropriate
do_div() calls
>> Can the avoidance of duplicate source code (according to SmPL disjunctions)
>> trigger positive effects on run time characteristics and software maintenance?
>
> Markus. Please stop asking this question.
This will not happen for a while.
> You are bothering people with this advice,
I present just another view.
> why don't _you_ figure out once and for all whether the change
> that you suggest has any "positive effects on the run time characteristics"?
> Hint: it will not.
* How much attention do you give to the software development principle
"Don't repeat yourself"?
* Can the file size of a SmPL script matter a bit?
> Coccinelle has a pass that propagates disjunctions at the sub-statement level
> to the statement level.
This data processing can probably trigger further development considerations.
Regards,
Markus
Powered by blists - more mailing lists