linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/84] 4.19.95-stable review

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200111204113.GA460087@kroah.com>
Date:   Sat, 11 Jan 2020 21:41:13 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Guenter Roeck <linux@...ck-us.net>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, torvalds@...ux-foundation.org,
        akpm@...ux-foundation.org, shuah@...nel.org, patches@...nelci.org,
        ben.hutchings@...ethink.co.uk, lkft-triage@...ts.linaro.org,
        stable@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 4.19 00/84] 4.19.95-stable review

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 12:10:11PM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> On 1/11/20 9:47 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:02:40AM -0800, Guenter Roeck wrote:
> > > On 1/11/20 1:49 AM, Greg Kroah-Hartman wrote:
> > > > This is the start of the stable review cycle for the 4.19.95 release.
> > > > There are 84 patches in this series, all will be posted as a response
> > > > to this one.  If anyone has any issues with these being applied, please
> > > > let me know.
> > > > 
> > > > Responses should be made by Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:46:17 +0000.
> > > > Anything received after that time might be too late.
> > > > 
> > > Build results:
> > > 	total: 156 pass: 154 fail: 2
> > > Failed builds:
> > > 	arm64:defconfig
> > > 	arm64:allmodconfig
> > > Qemu test results:
> > > 	total: 382 pass: 339 fail: 43
> > > Failed tests:
> > > 	<all arm64>
> > > 
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c: In function 'handle_tx2_tvm':
> > > arch/arm64/kvm/hyp/switch.c:438:2: error: implicit declaration of function '__kvm_skip_instr'; did you mean 'kvm_skip_instr'?
> > 
> > Thanks for this, I'll go push out a -rc2 with the offending patch
> > removed.
> > 
> 
> For v4.19.94-84-g4f77fc728c70:
> 
> Build results:
> 	total: 156 pass: 156 fail: 0
> Qemu test results:
> 	total: 382 pass: 382 fail: 0

Wonderful, thanks for testing all of these and letting me know.

greg k-h