[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <6159eaa4-4729-0c3d-0967-e855e2652772@arm.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 10:27:12 +0000
From: Robin Murphy <robin.murphy@....com>
To: Heiko Stuebner <heiko@...ech.de>, Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: mark.rutland@....com, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org,
robh+dt@...nel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] arm64: dts: rockchip: add reg property to brcmf sub node
On 13/01/2020 9:26 am, Heiko Stuebner wrote:
> Hi Johan,
>
> Am Freitag, 10. Januar 2020, 16:40:24 CET schrieb Johan Jonker:
>> Hi,
>>
>> Question for Heiko or rob+dt.
>> Where would should #address-cells and #size-cells go in the dts or to the dtsi.
>> In case they become required in a futhure rockchip-dw-mshc.yaml?
>> ie. Should we patch all XXX rockchip,rk3288-dw-mshc nodes with them?
>
> I don't think it is a required property for the dw-mmc itself, as only
> in special-cases do you need subnodes there. Like emmc and sd-cards
> are completely probeable without needing further information and
> only the wifi/bt chips _might_ need these.
>
> So I don't think that this is a property of the controller itself, but te
> connected card - hence should stay in the board file.
Indeed, and in general dtc already warns about those properties being
present unnecessarily, e.g.:
arch/arm64/boot/dts/rockchip/rk3399.dtsi:1812.27-1847.4: Warning
(avoid_unnecessary_addr_size): /mipi@...68000: unnecessary
#address-cells/#size-cells without "ranges" or child "reg" property
Robin.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists