linux-kernel - Re: [PATCHv9 08/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add 8-bit and 16-bit CSR register accessors

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 11:31:35 +0000
From:   Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
To:     "Z.q. Hou" <zhiqiang.hou@....com>
Cc:     "linux-pci@...r.kernel.org" <linux-pci@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "bhelgaas@...gle.com" <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "arnd@...db.de" <arnd@...db.de>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in" <l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in>,
        "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
        "m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in" <m.karthikeyan@...iveil.co.in>,
        Leo Li <leoyang.li@....com>,
        "lorenzo.pieralisi@....com" <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>,
        "catalin.marinas@....com" <catalin.marinas@....com>,
        "will.deacon@....com" <will.deacon@....com>,
        Mingkai Hu <mingkai.hu@....com>,
        "M.h. Lian" <minghuan.lian@....com>,
        Xiaowei Bao <xiaowei.bao@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCHv9 08/12] PCI: mobiveil: Add 8-bit and 16-bit CSR register
 accessors

On Wed, Nov 20, 2019 at 03:46:10AM +0000, Z.q. Hou wrote:
> From: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
> 
> There are some 8-bit and 16-bit registers in PCIe configuration
> space, so add these accessors accordingly.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Hou Zhiqiang <Zhiqiang.Hou@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Minghuan Lian <Minghuan.Lian@....com>
> Reviewed-by: Subrahmanya Lingappa <l.subrahmanya@...iveil.co.in>
> ---
> V9:
>  - No change
> 
>  .../pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h   | 23 +++++++++++++++++++
>  1 file changed, 23 insertions(+)
> 
> diff --git a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h
> index 37116c2a19fe..750a7fd95bc1 100644
> --- a/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h
> +++ b/drivers/pci/controller/mobiveil/pcie-mobiveil.h
> @@ -182,10 +182,33 @@ static inline u32 mobiveil_csr_readl(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
>  	return mobiveil_csr_read(pcie, off, 0x4);
>  }
>  
> +static inline u32 mobiveil_csr_readw(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +{
> +	return mobiveil_csr_read(pcie, off, 0x2);
> +}
> +
> +static inline u32 mobiveil_csr_readb(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 off)
> +{
> +	return mobiveil_csr_read(pcie, off, 0x1);
> +}

Do you think the above two return types should reflect the size of the access?

Thanks,

Andrew Murray

> +
> +
>  static inline void mobiveil_csr_writel(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 val,
>  				       u32 off)
>  {
>  	mobiveil_csr_write(pcie, val, off, 0x4);
>  }
>  
> +static inline void mobiveil_csr_writew(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 val,
> +				       u32 off)
> +{
> +	mobiveil_csr_write(pcie, val, off, 0x2);
> +}
> +
> +static inline void mobiveil_csr_writeb(struct mobiveil_pcie *pcie, u32 val,
> +				       u32 off)
> +{
> +	mobiveil_csr_write(pcie, val, off, 0x1);
> +}
> +
>  #endif /* _PCIE_MOBIVEIL_H */
> -- 
> 2.17.1
>