| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <20200113143818.GB390411@kroah.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:38:18 +0100
From: Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To: roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com
Cc: peterz@...radead.org, mingo@...hat.com, acme@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com, alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com,
jolsa@...hat.com, namhyung@...nel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, eranian@...gle.com,
bgregg@...flix.com, ak@...ux.intel.com, kan.liang@...ux.intel.com,
alexander.antonov@...el.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 2/2] perf x86: Exposing an Uncore unit to PMON for Intel Xeon® server platform
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 04:54:44PM +0300, roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com wrote:
> From: Roman Sudarikov <roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com>
>
> Current version supports a server line starting Intel® Xeon® Processor
> Scalable Family and introduces mapping for IIO Uncore units only.
> Other units can be added on demand.
>
> IIO stack to PMON mapping is exposed through:
> /sys/devices/uncore_iio_<pmu_idx>/platform_mapping
> in the following format: domain:bus
>
> For example, on a 4-die Intel Xeon® server platform:
> $ cat /sys/devices/uncore_iio_0/platform_mapping
> 0000:00,0000:40,0000:80,0000:c0
That's horrid to parse. Sysfs should be one value per file, why not
have individual files for all of these things?
> Which means:
> IIO PMON block 0 on die 0 belongs to IIO stack on bus 0x00, domain 0x0000
> IIO PMON block 0 on die 1 belongs to IIO stack on bus 0x40, domain 0x0000
> IIO PMON block 0 on die 2 belongs to IIO stack on bus 0x80, domain 0x0000
> IIO PMON block 0 on die 3 belongs to IIO stack on bus 0xc0, domain 0x0000
Where did you get the die number from the above data?
>
> Co-developed-by: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...el.com>
> Reviewed-by: Kan Liang <kan.liang@...ux.intel.com>
> Signed-off-by: Alexander Antonov <alexander.antonov@...el.com>
> Signed-off-by: Roman Sudarikov <roman.sudarikov@...ux.intel.com>
> ---
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c | 2 +-
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h | 1 +
> arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c | 162 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++
> 3 files changed, 164 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> index 2c53ad44b51f..c0d86bc8e786 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.c
> @@ -16,7 +16,7 @@ struct pci_driver *uncore_pci_driver;
> DEFINE_RAW_SPINLOCK(pci2phy_map_lock);
> struct list_head pci2phy_map_head = LIST_HEAD_INIT(pci2phy_map_head);
> struct pci_extra_dev *uncore_extra_pci_dev;
> -static int max_dies;
> +int max_dies;
Horrible global variable name :(
"unicore_max_dies" instead please.
> /* mask of cpus that collect uncore events */
> static cpumask_t uncore_cpu_mask;
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> index f52dd3f112a7..94eacca6f485 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore.h
> @@ -523,6 +523,7 @@ extern raw_spinlock_t pci2phy_map_lock;
> extern struct list_head pci2phy_map_head;
> extern struct pci_extra_dev *uncore_extra_pci_dev;
> extern struct event_constraint uncore_constraint_empty;
> +extern int max_dies;
>
> /* uncore_snb.c */
> int snb_uncore_pci_init(void);
> diff --git a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> index b10a5ec79e48..2562fde2e5b8 100644
> --- a/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> +++ b/arch/x86/events/intel/uncore_snbep.c
> @@ -273,6 +273,30 @@
> #define SKX_CPUNODEID 0xc0
> #define SKX_GIDNIDMAP 0xd4
>
> +/*
> + * The CPU_BUS_NUMBER MSR returns the values of the respective CPUBUSNO CSR
> + * that BIOS programmed. MSR has package scope.
> + * | Bit | Default | Description
> + * | [63] | 00h | VALID - When set, indicates the CPU bus
> + * numbers have been initialized. (RO)
> + * |[62:48]| --- | Reserved
> + * |[47:40]| 00h | BUS_NUM_5 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(5). (RO)
> + * |[39:32]| 00h | BUS_NUM_4 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(4). (RO)
> + * |[31:24]| 00h | BUS_NUM_3 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(3). (RO)
> + * |[23:16]| 00h | BUS_NUM_2 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(2). (RO)
> + * |[15:8] | 00h | BUS_NUM_1 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(1). (RO)
> + * | [7:0] | 00h | BUS_NUM_0 — Return the bus number BIOS assigned
> + * CPUBUSNO(0). (RO)
> + */
> +#define SKX_MSR_CPU_BUS_NUMBER 0x300
> +#define SKX_MSR_CPU_BUS_VALID_BIT (1ULL << 63)
> +#define BUS_NUM_STRIDE 8
> +
> /* SKX CHA */
> #define SKX_CHA_MSR_PMON_BOX_FILTER_TID (0x1ffULL << 0)
> #define SKX_CHA_MSR_PMON_BOX_FILTER_LINK (0xfULL << 9)
> @@ -3580,6 +3604,9 @@ static struct intel_uncore_ops skx_uncore_iio_ops = {
> .read_counter = uncore_msr_read_counter,
> };
>
> +static int skx_iio_get_topology(struct intel_uncore_type *type);
> +static int skx_iio_set_mapping(struct intel_uncore_type *type);
> +
> static struct intel_uncore_type skx_uncore_iio = {
> .name = "iio",
> .num_counters = 4,
> @@ -3594,6 +3621,8 @@ static struct intel_uncore_type skx_uncore_iio = {
> .constraints = skx_uncore_iio_constraints,
> .ops = &skx_uncore_iio_ops,
> .format_group = &skx_uncore_iio_format_group,
> + .get_topology = skx_iio_get_topology,
> + .set_mapping = skx_iio_set_mapping,
> };
>
> enum perf_uncore_iio_freerunning_type_id {
> @@ -3780,6 +3809,139 @@ static int skx_count_chabox(void)
> return hweight32(val);
> }
>
> +static inline int skx_msr_cpu_bus_read(int cpu, u64 *topology)
> +{
> + u64 msr_value;
> +
> + if (rdmsrl_on_cpu(cpu, SKX_MSR_CPU_BUS_NUMBER, &msr_value) ||
> + !(msr_value & SKX_MSR_CPU_BUS_VALID_BIT))
> + return -1;
> +
> + *topology = msr_value;
> +
> + return 0;
> +}
> +
> +static int skx_iio_get_topology(struct intel_uncore_type *type)
> +{
> + int ret, cpu, die, current_die;
> + struct pci_bus *bus = NULL;
> +
> + /*
> + * Verified single-segment environments only; disabled for multiple
> + * segment topologies for now.
> + */
> + while ((bus = pci_find_next_bus(bus)) && !pci_domain_nr(bus))
> + ;
> + if (bus) {
> + pr_info("I/O stack mapping is not supported for multi-seg\n");
> + return -1;
Do not make up random negative error values, use a #defined one please.
And shouldn't this be dev_err()? What happens if a user gets this, who
do they complain to, their BIOS vendor?
thanks,
greg k-h
Powered by blists - more mailing lists