[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CA+h21hpsauapCGEHqVqHpEU2K-VsAh3vKBRJ_N8iq2i35SedOw@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:55:51 +0200
From: Vladimir Oltean <olteanv@...il.com>
To: Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com>
Cc: Russell King - ARM Linux admin <linux@...linux.org.uk>,
Andrew Lunn <andrew@...n.ch>,
"netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
Joao Pinto <Joao.Pinto@...opsys.com>,
Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
Heiner Kallweit <hkallweit1@...il.com>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC net-next] net: phy: Add basic support for Synopsys XPCS
using a PHY driver
Hi Jose,
On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 at 16:28, Jose Abreu <Jose.Abreu@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> This uses Clause 73 for Autoneg. I can add that into PHYLINK core if you
> agree.
>
Clauses 72 and 73 describe some PMD link training procedure too, as
part of auto-negotiation for 10GBase-KR. Does the XGPCS do any of
that? Is this series sufficient for link training to work when in the
10GBase-KR copper backplane link mode?
> ---
> Thanks,
> Jose Miguel Abreu
Regards,
-Vladimir
Powered by blists - more mailing lists