[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200113151253.GA10064@lst.de>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:12:53 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>
Cc: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-mips@...r.kernel.org,
chenhc@...ote.com, paul.burton@...s.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/2] MIPS: Define pgprot_dmacoherent according to
coherentio status
On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:11:58PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
>
> 于 2020年1月13日 GMT+08:00 下午10:58:20, Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de> 写到:
> >On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 10:07:04PM +0800, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
> >> For MIPS chips that support coherentio DMA, it's always safe
> >> to make DMA requests cached.
> >
> >For DMA coherent devices pgprot_dmacoherent isn't even used, so this
> >doesn't make sense.
>
> Hi,
>
> I'm supposed to use it later in drm/ttm
> ttm_bo_util to overwrite pgprot for TTM_PL_SYSTEM.
> And I wish this pgropt can always represent dmacoherent pgropt.
> Would it be fine?
No code outside the core DMA code has any business using
pgprot_dmacoherent.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists