lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200113161120.GA49290@jaegeuk-macbookpro.roam.corp.google.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 08:11:20 -0800
From:   Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To:     Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v5] f2fs: support data compression

On 01/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/1/12 2:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2020/1/11 7:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 01/06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>> On 2020/1/3 14:50, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>>> This works to me. Could you run fsstress tests on compressed root directory?
> >>>>>> It seems still there are some bugs.
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Jaegeuk,
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Did you mean running por_fsstress testcase?
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Now, at least I didn't hit any problem for normal fsstress case.
> >>>>
> >>>> Yup. por_fsstress
> >>>
> >>> Please check https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs/commits/g-dev-test.
> >>> I've fixed
> >>> - truncation offset
> >>> - i_compressed_blocks and its lock coverage
> >>> - error handling
> >>> - etc
> >>
> >> I changed as below, and por_fsstress stops panic the system.
> >>
> >> Could you merge all these fixes into original patch?
> > 
> > Yup, let m roll up some early patches first once test results become good.
> 
> I didn't encounter issue any more, how about por_fsstress test result in your
> enviornment? If there is, please share the call stack with me.

Sure, will do, once I hit an issue. BTW, I'm hitting another unreacheable nat
entry issue during por_stress without compression. :(

Thanks,

> 
> Thanks,
> 
> > 
> >>
> >> >From bb17d7d77fe0b8a3e3632a7026550800ab9609e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:58:20 +0800
> >> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: compress: fix f2fs_put_rpages_mapping()
> >>
> >> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >> ---
> >>  fs/f2fs/compress.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >>  1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>
> >> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >> index 502cd0ddc2a7..5c6a31d84ce4 100644
> >> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >> @@ -74,18 +74,10 @@ static void f2fs_put_compressed_page(struct page *page)
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >> -		struct address_space *mapping, int len, bool unlock)
> >> +					int len, bool unlock)
> >>  {
> >>  	unsigned int i;
> >>  	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >> -		if (mapping) {
> >> -			pgoff_t start = start_idx_of_cluster(cc);
> >> -			struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i);
> >> -
> >> -			put_page(page);
> >> -			put_page(page);
> >> -			cc->rpages[i] = NULL;
> >> -		}
> >>  		if (!cc->rpages[i])
> >>  			continue;
> >>  		if (unlock)
> >> @@ -97,18 +89,25 @@ static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>
> >>  static void f2fs_put_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc)
> >>  {
> >> -	f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, cc->cluster_size, false);
> >> +	f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, cc->cluster_size, false);
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void f2fs_unlock_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc, int len)
> >>  {
> >> -	f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, len, true);
> >> +	f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, len, true);
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >> -				struct address_space *mapping, int len)
> >> +				struct address_space *mapping,
> >> +				pgoff_t start, int len)
> >>  {
> >> -	f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, mapping, len, false);
> >> +	int i;
> >> +	for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >> +		struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i);
> >> +
> >> +		put_page(page);
> >> +		put_page(page);
> >> +	}
> >>  }
> >>
> >>  static void f2fs_put_rpages_wbc(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >> @@ -680,7 +679,8 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>
> >>  		if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> >>  			f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i + 1);
> >> -			f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, cc->cluster_size);
> >> +			f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx,
> >> +					cc->cluster_size);
> >>  			f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc);
> >>  			goto retry;
> >>  		}
> >> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>  unlock_pages:
> >>  	f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i);
> >>  release_pages:
> >> -	f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, i);
> >> +	f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx, i);
> >>  	f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc);
> >>  	return ret;
> >>  }
> >> -- 
> >> 2.18.0.rc1
> >>
> >>
> >>
> >>>
> >>> One another fix in f2fs-tools as well.
> >>> https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs-tools
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Thanks,
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> > 

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ