linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARC: handle DSP presence in HW

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <1a0b853a-32f4-09eb-2aeb-acf63a092f02@synopsys.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 16:49:24 +0000
From:   Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
To:     Eugeniy Paltsev <Eugeniy.Paltsev@...opsys.com>,
        "linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org" 
        <linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org>
CC:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "Alexey Brodkin" <Alexey.Brodkin@...opsys.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 3/5] ARC: handle DSP presence in HW

On 1/10/20 6:54 AM, Eugeniy Paltsev wrote:
>
>>> +             CHK_OPT_STRICT(CONFIG_ARC_DSP_KERNEL, present);
>>>       }
> My idea here is to encapsulate implementation of everything dsp-related in the
> file with dsp code. So I'm even thinking about moving the config check itself
> to some function like
> 'arc_chk_dsp_config' which will be located in dsp.x file
> and call it from arc_chk_core_config in setup.c
>
> This requires to move config check helpers to separate file/header from the setup.c
> However this allows encapsulate all DSP code (and some new subsystems code later on) in its files instead of spread it across the arc code.
>
> What do you think about it? If you really dislike this idea I can drop it.

Ok makes sense then !

-Vineet