linux-kernel - Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm-soc tree

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:52:13 -0800
From:   Olof Johansson <olof@...om.net>
To:     Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au>
Cc:     Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com>,
        Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        Linux Next Mailing List <linux-next@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ludovic Barre <ludovic.barre@...com>,
        Yann Gautier <yann.gautier@...com>
Subject: Re: linux-next: Signed-off-by missing for commit in the arm-soc tree

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 3:46 AM Stephen Rothwell <sfr@...b.auug.org.au> wrote:
>
> Hi Alexandre,
>
> On Mon, 13 Jan 2020 09:17:08 +0100 Alexandre Torgue <alexandre.torgue@...com> wrote:
> >
> > Sorry for this oversight. DO I have something to do ? (except to not
> > forget to check my signed-off next time).
>
> That is up to the arm-soc tree maintainers.

Nothing needed at this time.

The point of making sure maintainers sign off on patches is to track
their path into the tree. In this case we still know it comes in via
you. But make sure you're diligent on this for future patches.


Thanks!

-Olof