[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <20200113180720.77461-1-jernej.skrabec@siol.net>
Date: Mon, 13 Jan 2020 19:07:20 +0100
From: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
To: mripard@...nel.org, wens@...e.org, robh+dt@...nel.org,
mark.rutland@....com
Cc: linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-sunxi@...glegroups.com
Subject: [PATCH] arm64: dts: allwinner: h6: tanix-tx6: Use internal oscillator
Tanix TX6 doesn't have external 32 kHz oscillator, so switch RTC clock
to internal one.
Signed-off-by: Jernej Skrabec <jernej.skrabec@...l.net>
---
While this patch gives one possible solution, I mainly want to start
discussion why Allwinner SoC dtsi reference external 32 kHz crystal
although some boards don't have it. My proposal would be to make clock
property optional, based on the fact if external crystal is present or
not. However, I'm not sure if that is possible at this point or not.
Driver also considers missing clock property as deprecated (old DT) [1],
so this might complicate things even further.
What do you think?
Best regards,
Jernej
[1] https://elixir.bootlin.com/linux/latest/source/drivers/rtc/rtc-sun6i.c#L263
arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts | 6 ++++++
1 file changed, 6 insertions(+)
diff --git a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
index 83e6cb0e59ce..af3aebda47bb 100644
--- a/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
+++ b/arch/arm64/boot/dts/allwinner/sun50i-h6-tanix-tx6.dts
@@ -91,6 +91,12 @@ &r_ir {
status = "okay";
};
+/* This board doesn't have external 32 kHz crystal. */
+&rtc {
+ assigned-clocks = <&rtc 0>;
+ assigned-clock-parents = <&rtc 2>;
+};
+
&uart0 {
pinctrl-names = "default";
pinctrl-0 = <&uart0_ph_pins>;
--
2.24.1
Powered by blists - more mailing lists