linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] media: dvb_dummy_tuner: implement driver skeleton

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <d6d119cf-7447-31ce-37db-25503cf2f9bc@gmail.com>
Date:   Mon, 13 Jan 2020 15:23:02 -0300
From:   "Daniel W. S. Almeida" <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>
To:     Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
Cc:     mchehab@...nel.org, sean@...s.org, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-media@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        skhan@...uxfoundation.org,
        linux-kernel-mentees@...ts.linuxfoundation.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] media: dvb_dummy_tuner: implement driver skeleton

Hi Greg,

I am working on v3. Would you mind clarifying this?


>> + *
>> + * The virtual DVB test driver serves as a reference DVB driver and helps
>> + * validate the existing APIs in the media subsystem. It can also aid developers
>> + * working on userspace applications.
>> + *
>> + * This dummy tuner should support common TV standards such as DVB-T/T2/S/S2,
>> + * ISDB-T and ATSC when completed.
>> + *
>> + * Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>
> Normally this is the first comment line above in this block.
>

Just so we're clear, do you mean this? e.g.:

+ * Copyright (c) 2020 Daniel W. S. Almeida <dwlsalmeida@...il.com>
+ *
+ * The virtual DVB test driver serves as a reference DVB driver and helps
+ * validate the existing APIs in the media subsystem. It can also aid developers
+ * working on userspace applications.
+ *
+ * This dummy tuner should support common TV standards such as DVB-T/T2/S/S2,
+ * ISDB-T and ATSC when completed.
+ *


> Not the same license as your .c file?  Odd :(

Oops! :(


> If you keep this file, same comments as above for the comment block, but
> really, you don't need this .h file at all, just drop it.

OK.


- Daniel