linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: Use larger zlib buffer for s390 hardware compression

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:19:31 +0100
From:   David Sterba <dsterba@...e.cz>
To:     Zaslonko Mikhail <zaslonko@...ux.ibm.com>
Cc:     Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Chris Mason <clm@...com>, David Sterba <dsterba@...e.com>,
        Richard Purdie <rpurdie@...ys.net>,
        Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
        Vasily Gorbik <gor@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Christian Borntraeger <borntraeger@...ibm.com>,
        Eduard Shishkin <edward6@...ux.ibm.com>,
        Ilya Leoshkevich <iii@...ux.ibm.com>,
        linux-s390@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4] btrfs: Use larger zlib buffer for s390 hardware
 compression

On Mon, Jan 13, 2020 at 11:03:29AM +0100, Zaslonko Mikhail wrote:
> Hello David,
> 
> On 09.01.2020 02:10, David Sterba wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 08, 2020 at 07:48:31PM +0100, Zaslonko Mikhail wrote:
> >>>> +        } else if (workspace->strm.avail_out == 0) {
> >>>> +            /* get another page for the stream end */
> >>>> +            kunmap(out_page);
> >>>> +            if (nr_pages == nr_dest_pages) {
> >>>> +                out_page = NULL;
> >>>> +                ret = -E2BIG;
> >>>> +                goto out;
> >>>> +            }
> >>>> +            out_page = alloc_page(GFP_NOFS | __GFP_HIGHMEM);
> >>>> +            if (out_page == NULL) {
> >>>> +                ret = -ENOMEM;
> >>>> +                goto out;
> >>>> +            }
> >>>
> >>> Do we need zlib_deflateEnd() for the above error cases?  Thanks,
> >>
> >> The original btrfs code did not call zlib_deflateEnd() for -E2BIG and 
> >> -ENOMEM cases, so I stick to the same logic.
> >> Unlike userspace zlib where deflateEnd() frees all dynamically allocated 
> >> memory, in the kernel it doesn't do much apart from setting the return 
> >> code (since all the memory allocations for kernel zlib are performed in advance).
> > 
> > Agreed, deflateEnd is not necessary in the error cases.
> 
> Can I consider this as 'Acked-by' from your side?

Yes, I also sent rev-by to the patch.