[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114172845.GF3897@sirena.org.uk>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:28:45 +0000
From: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
To: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 02/12] ELF: Add ELF program property parsing support
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 04:34:03PM +0000, Catalin Marinas wrote:
> The logic looks fine to me but I'm not sure the choice of returning -EIO
> is suitable in most cases. I think apart from kernel_read() returning an
> error, there rest look like malformed ELF notes, so rather -ENOEXEC.
Sure, I don't have strong opinions either way.
Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists