[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114173433.GK30444@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:34:33 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 07/12] arm64: BTI: Decode BYTPE bits when printing
PSTATE
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:42:01PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
>
> The current code to print PSTATE symbolically when generating
> backtraces etc., does not include the BYTPE field used by Branch
> Target Identification.
>
> So, decode BYTPE and print it too.
>
> In the interests of human-readability, print the classes of BTI
> matched. The symbolic notation, BYTPE (PSTATE[11:10]) and
> permitted classes of subsequent instruction are:
>
> -- (BTYPE=0b00): any insn
> jc (BTYPE=0b01): BTI jc, BTI j, BTI c, PACIxSP
> -c (BYTPE=0b10): BTI jc, BTI c, PACIxSP
> j- (BTYPE=0b11): BTI jc, BTI j
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists