[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114173656.GN30444@arrakis.emea.arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:36:56 +0000
From: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
To: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Cc: Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>, Paul Elliott <paul.elliott@....com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Yu-cheng Yu <yu-cheng.yu@...el.com>,
Amit Kachhap <amit.kachhap@....com>,
Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>,
Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>,
Eugene Syromiatnikov <esyr@...hat.com>,
Szabolcs Nagy <szabolcs.nagy@....com>,
"H.J. Lu" <hjl.tools@...il.com>, Andrew Jones <drjones@...hat.com>,
Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>, Jann Horn <jannh@...gle.com>,
Richard Henderson <richard.henderson@...aro.org>,
Kristina Martšenko <kristina.martsenko@....com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Florian Weimer <fweimer@...hat.com>,
Sudakshina Das <sudi.das@....com>,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arch@...r.kernel.org, Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 11/12] KVM: arm64: BTI: Reset BTYPE when skipping
emulated instructions
On Wed, Dec 11, 2019 at 03:42:05PM +0000, Mark Brown wrote:
> From: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
>
> Since normal execution of any non-branch instruction resets the
> PSTATE BTYPE field to 0, so do the same thing when emulating a
> trapped instruction.
>
> Branches don't trap directly, so we should never need to assign a
> non-zero value to BTYPE here.
>
> Signed-off-by: Dave Martin <Dave.Martin@....com>
> Signed-off-by: Mark Brown <broonie@...nel.org>
Reviewed-by: Catalin Marinas <catalin.marinas@....com>
Powered by blists - more mailing lists