lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <8a7057fe1aaf415272d28f4e690313984c3a148d.camel@suse.de>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 19:18:46 +0100
From:   Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
To:     Lorenzo Pieralisi <lorenzo.pieralisi@....com>
Cc:     andrew.murray@....com, maz@...nel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        Florian Fainelli <f.fainelli@...il.com>,
        bcm-kernel-feedback-list@...adcom.com, james.quinlan@...adcom.com,
        mbrugger@...e.com, phil@...pberrypi.org, wahrenst@....net,
        jeremy.linton@....com, linux-pci@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-rpi-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        Bjorn Helgaas <bhelgaas@...gle.com>,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5 3/6] PCI: brcmstb: Add Broadcom STB PCIe host
 controller driver

Hi Lorenzo,

On Tue, 2020-01-14 at 17:11 +0000, Lorenzo Pieralisi wrote:
> On Mon, Dec 16, 2019 at 12:01:09PM +0100, Nicolas Saenz Julienne wrote:
> > From: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
> > 
> > This adds a basic driver for Broadcom's STB PCIe controller, for now
> > aimed at Raspberry Pi 4's SoC, bcm2711.
> > 
> > Signed-off-by: Jim Quinlan <james.quinlan@...adcom.com>
> > Co-developed-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > Signed-off-by: Nicolas Saenz Julienne <nsaenzjulienne@...e.de>
> > Reviewed-by: Andrew Murray <andrew.murray@....com>
> > Reviewed-by: Jeremy Linton <jeremy.linton@....com>
> > 
> > ---
> > 
> > Changes since v3:
> >   - Update commit message
> >   - rollback roundup_pow_two usage, it'll be updated later down the line
> >   - Remove comment in register definition
> > 
> > Changes since v2:
> >   - Correct rc_bar2_offset sign
> 
> In relation to this change.
> 
> [...]
> 
> > +static inline int brcm_pcie_get_rc_bar2_size_and_offset(struct brcm_pcie
> > *pcie,
> > +							u64 *rc_bar2_size,
> > +							u64 *rc_bar2_offset)
> > +{
> > +	struct pci_host_bridge *bridge = pci_host_bridge_from_priv(pcie);
> > +	struct device *dev = pcie->dev;
> > +	struct resource_entry *entry;
> > +
> > +	entry = resource_list_first_type(&bridge->dma_ranges, IORESOURCE_MEM);
> > +	if (!entry)
> > +		return -ENODEV;
> > +
> > +	*rc_bar2_offset = -entry->offset;
> 
> I think this deserves a comment - I guess it has to do with how the
> controller expects CPU<->PCI offsets to be expressed compared to how it
> is computed in dma_ranges entries.

You're right, OF code calculates it by doing:

	offset = cpu_start_addr - pci_start_addr (see
devm_of_pci_get_host_bridge_resources())

While the RC_BAR2_CONFIG register expects the opposite subtraction. I'll add a
comment on the next revision.

> I will try to complete the review shortly and try to apply it given
> that it has already been reviewed by others.

Thanks!

Regards,
Nicolas

> Lorenzo
> 


Download attachment "signature.asc" of type "application/pgp-signature" (489 bytes)

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ