linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v2] siox: Use the correct style for SPDX License Identifier

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200114204734.GA2221856@kroah.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:47:34 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Uwe Kleine-König 
        <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
Cc:     Thorsten Scherer <thorsten.scherer@...elmann.de>,
        Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>,
        Pengutronix Kernel Team <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
        Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2] siox: Use the correct style for SPDX License
 Identifier

On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 08:32:04AM +0100, Uwe Kleine-König wrote:
> Hello,
> 
> On Tue, Jan 07, 2020 at 07:32:50AM +0100, Thorsten Scherer wrote:
> > On Wed, Jan 01, 2020 at 06:44:23PM +0530, Nishad Kamdar wrote:
> > > This patch corrects the SPDX License Identifier style in
> > > header file related to Eckelmann SIOX driver.
> > > For C header files Documentation/process/license-rules.rst
> > > mandates C-like comments (opposed to C source files where
> > > C++ style should be used).
> > > 
> > > Changes made by using a script provided by Joe Perches here:
> > > https://lkml.org/lkml/2019/2/7/46.
> > > 
> > > Suggested-by: Joe Perches <joe@...ches.com>
> > > Signed-off-by: Nishad Kamdar <nishadkamdar@...il.com>
> > > Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
> > 
> > Acked-by: Thorsten Scherer <thorsten.scherer@...elmann.de>
> 
> Acked-by: Uwe Kleine-König <u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>

Ah, this is why I had 2 acks, you acked it twice :)