[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <9970E373-DF70-4FE4-A839-AAE641612EC5@lca.pw>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:48:22 -0500
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: paulmck@...nel.org
Cc: Marco Elver <elver@...gle.com>,
LKMM Maintainers -- Akira Yokosawa <akiyks@...il.com>,
Alan Stern <stern@...land.harvard.edu>,
Alexander Potapenko <glider@...gle.com>,
Andrea Parri <parri.andrea@...il.com>,
Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>,
Andy Lutomirski <luto@...nel.org>,
Ard Biesheuvel <ard.biesheuvel@...aro.org>,
Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
Boqun Feng <boqun.feng@...il.com>,
Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>, Daniel Axtens <dja@...ens.net>,
Daniel Lustig <dlustig@...dia.com>,
Dave Hansen <dave.hansen@...ux.intel.com>,
David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>,
"H. Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Jade Alglave <j.alglave@....ac.uk>,
Joel Fernandes <joel@...lfernandes.org>,
Jonathan Corbet <corbet@....net>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Luc Maranget <luc.maranget@...ia.fr>,
Mark Rutland <Mark.Rutland@....com>,
Nicholas Piggin <npiggin@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Eric Dumazet <edumazet@...gle.com>,
kasan-dev <kasan-dev@...glegroups.com>,
linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>,
"open list:DOCUMENTATION" <linux-doc@...r.kernel.org>,
linux-efi@...r.kernel.org,
Linux Kbuild mailing list <linux-kbuild@...r.kernel.org>,
LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux Memory Management List <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
the arch/x86 maintainers <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v4 01/10] kcsan: Add Kernel Concurrency Sanitizer infrastructure
> On Jan 14, 2020, at 4:34 PM, Paul E. McKenney <paulmck@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> As an alternative, once the patches needed for your tests to pass
> reach mainline, you could announce that KCSAN was ready to be enabled
> in distros.
>
> Though I confess that I don't know how that works. Is there a separate
> testing kernel binary provided by the distros in question?
I don’t think I have powers to announce that. Once the feature hit the mainline, distro people could start to use in the debug kernel variant, and it is a shame to only find out it is broken. Anyway, I’ll try to edge out those corner cases. Stay tuned.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists