| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 14:48:37 -0800
From: Jaegeuk Kim <jaegeuk@...nel.org>
To: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
Cc: linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-f2fs-devel@...ts.sourceforge.net
Subject: Re: [f2fs-dev] [RFC PATCH v5] f2fs: support data compression
On 01/14, Chao Yu wrote:
> On 2020/1/14 0:11, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> > On 01/13, Chao Yu wrote:
> >> On 2020/1/12 2:02, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>> On 01/11, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>> On 2020/1/11 7:52, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>> On 01/06, Jaegeuk Kim wrote:
> >>>>>> On 01/06, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>> On 2020/1/3 14:50, Chao Yu wrote:
> >>>>>>>> This works to me. Could you run fsstress tests on compressed root directory?
> >>>>>>>> It seems still there are some bugs.
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Jaegeuk,
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Did you mean running por_fsstress testcase?
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Now, at least I didn't hit any problem for normal fsstress case.
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>> Yup. por_fsstress
> >>>>>
> >>>>> Please check https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs/commits/g-dev-test.
> >>>>> I've fixed
> >>>>> - truncation offset
> >>>>> - i_compressed_blocks and its lock coverage
> >>>>> - error handling
> >>>>> - etc
> >>>>
> >>>> I changed as below, and por_fsstress stops panic the system.
> >>>>
> >>>> Could you merge all these fixes into original patch?
> >>>
> >>> Yup, let m roll up some early patches first once test results become good.
> >>
> >> I didn't encounter issue any more, how about por_fsstress test result in your
> >> enviornment? If there is, please share the call stack with me.
> >
> > Sure, will do, once I hit an issue. BTW, I'm hitting another unreacheable nat
> > entry issue during por_stress without compression. :(
>
> Did you enable any features during por_fsstress test?
>
> I only hit below warning during por_fsstress test on image w/o compression.
>
> ------------[ cut here ]------------
> WARNING: CPU: 10 PID: 33483 at fs/fs-writeback.c:1448 __writeback_single_inode+0x28c/0x340
> Call Trace:
> writeback_single_inode+0xad/0x120
> sync_inode_metadata+0x3d/0x60
> f2fs_sync_inode_meta+0x90/0xe0 [f2fs]
> block_operations+0x17c/0x360 [f2fs]
> f2fs_write_checkpoint+0x101/0xff0 [f2fs]
> f2fs_sync_fs+0xa8/0x130 [f2fs]
> f2fs_do_sync_file+0x19c/0x880 [f2fs]
> do_fsync+0x38/0x60
> __x64_sys_fsync+0x10/0x20
> do_syscall_64+0x5f/0x220
> entry_SYSCALL_64_after_hwframe+0x44/0xa9
Does gc_mutex patch fix this?
>
> Thanks,
>
> >
> > Thanks,
> >
> >>
> >> Thanks,
> >>
> >>>
> >>>>
> >>>> >From bb17d7d77fe0b8a3e3632a7026550800ab9609e9 Mon Sep 17 00:00:00 2001
> >>>> From: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >>>> Date: Sat, 11 Jan 2020 16:58:20 +0800
> >>>> Subject: [PATCH] f2fs: compress: fix f2fs_put_rpages_mapping()
> >>>>
> >>>> Signed-off-by: Chao Yu <yuchao0@...wei.com>
> >>>> ---
> >>>> fs/f2fs/compress.c | 30 +++++++++++++++---------------
> >>>> 1 file changed, 15 insertions(+), 15 deletions(-)
> >>>>
> >>>> diff --git a/fs/f2fs/compress.c b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >>>> index 502cd0ddc2a7..5c6a31d84ce4 100644
> >>>> --- a/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >>>> +++ b/fs/f2fs/compress.c
> >>>> @@ -74,18 +74,10 @@ static void f2fs_put_compressed_page(struct page *page)
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>> - struct address_space *mapping, int len, bool unlock)
> >>>> + int len, bool unlock)
> >>>> {
> >>>> unsigned int i;
> >>>> for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >>>> - if (mapping) {
> >>>> - pgoff_t start = start_idx_of_cluster(cc);
> >>>> - struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i);
> >>>> -
> >>>> - put_page(page);
> >>>> - put_page(page);
> >>>> - cc->rpages[i] = NULL;
> >>>> - }
> >>>> if (!cc->rpages[i])
> >>>> continue;
> >>>> if (unlock)
> >>>> @@ -97,18 +89,25 @@ static void f2fs_drop_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>>
> >>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, cc->cluster_size, false);
> >>>> + f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, cc->cluster_size, false);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> static void f2fs_unlock_rpages(struct compress_ctx *cc, int len)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, NULL, len, true);
> >>>> + f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, len, true);
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>> - struct address_space *mapping, int len)
> >>>> + struct address_space *mapping,
> >>>> + pgoff_t start, int len)
> >>>> {
> >>>> - f2fs_drop_rpages(cc, mapping, len, false);
> >>>> + int i;
> >>>> + for (i = 0; i < len; i++) {
> >>>> + struct page *page = find_get_page(mapping, start + i);
> >>>> +
> >>>> + put_page(page);
> >>>> + put_page(page);
> >>>> + }
> >>>> }
> >>>>
> >>>> static void f2fs_put_rpages_wbc(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>> @@ -680,7 +679,8 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>>
> >>>> if (!PageUptodate(page)) {
> >>>> f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i + 1);
> >>>> - f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, cc->cluster_size);
> >>>> + f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx,
> >>>> + cc->cluster_size);
> >>>> f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc);
> >>>> goto retry;
> >>>> }
> >>>> @@ -714,7 +714,7 @@ static int prepare_compress_overwrite(struct compress_ctx *cc,
> >>>> unlock_pages:
> >>>> f2fs_unlock_rpages(cc, i);
> >>>> release_pages:
> >>>> - f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, i);
> >>>> + f2fs_put_rpages_mapping(cc, mapping, start_idx, i);
> >>>> f2fs_destroy_compress_ctx(cc);
> >>>> return ret;
> >>>> }
> >>>> --
> >>>> 2.18.0.rc1
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>
> >>>>>
> >>>>> One another fix in f2fs-tools as well.
> >>>>> https://github.com/jaegeuk/f2fs-tools
> >>>>>
> >>>>>>
> >>>>>>>
> >>>>>>> Thanks,
> >>>>> .
> >>>>>
> >>> .
> >>>
> > .
> >
Powered by blists - more mailing lists