linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over symlinks

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200114045733.GW8904@ZenIV.linux.org.uk>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 04:57:33 +0000
From:   Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>
To:     Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>
Cc:     Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        David Howells <dhowells@...hat.com>,
        Eric Biederman <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        stable <stable@...r.kernel.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Serge Hallyn <serge@...lyn.com>, dev@...ncontainers.org,
        Linux Containers <containers@...ts.linux-foundation.org>,
        Linux API <linux-api@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-fsdevel <linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        Ian Kent <raven@...maw.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH RFC 0/1] mount: universally disallow mounting over
 symlinks

On Sat, Jan 11, 2020 at 08:07:19AM +1100, Aleksa Sarai wrote:

> If I'm understanding this proposal correctly, this would be a problem
> for the libpathrs use-case -- if this is done then there's no way to
> avoid a TOCTOU with someone mounting and the userspace program checking
> whether something is a mountpoint (unless you have Linux >5.6 and
> RESOLVE_NO_XDEV). Today, you can (in theory) do it with MNT_EXPIRE:
> 
>   1. Open the candidate directory.
>   2. umount2(MNT_EXPIRE) the fd.
>     * -EINVAL means it wasn't a mountpoint when we got the fd, and the
> 	  fd is a stable handle to the underlying directory.
> 	* -EAGAIN or -EBUSY means that it was a mountpoint or became a
> 	  mountpoint after the fd was opened (we don't care about that, but
> 	  fail-safe is better here).
>   3. Use the fd from (1) for all operations.

... except that foo/../bar *WILL* cross into the covering mount, on any
kernel that supports ...at(2) at all, so I would be very cautious about
any kind "hardening" claims in that case.

I'm not sure about Linus' proposal - it looks rather convoluted and we
get a hard to describe twist of semantics in an area (procfs symlinks
vs. mount traversal) on top of everything else in there...

Anyway, a couple of questions:

1) do you see any problems on your testcases with the current #fixes?
That's commit 7a955b7363b8 as branch tip.

2) do you have any updates you would like to fold into stuff in
#work.openat2?  Right now I have a local variant of #work.namei (with
fairly cosmetical change compared to vfs.git one) that merges clean
with #work.openat2; I would like to do any updates/fold-ins/etc.
of #work.openat2 *before* doing a merge and continuing to work on
top of the merge results...