[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114062605.GD2818@vkoul-mobl>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:56:05 +0530
From: Vinod Koul <vkoul@...nel.org>
To: Pierre-Louis Bossart <pierre-louis.bossart@...ux.intel.com>
Cc: alsa-devel@...a-project.org, tiwai@...e.de,
gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
Ranjani Sridharan <ranjani.sridharan@...ux.intel.com>,
broonie@...nel.org, srinivas.kandagatla@...aro.org,
jank@...ence.com, slawomir.blauciak@...el.com,
Sanyog Kale <sanyog.r.kale@...el.com>,
Bard liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>,
Rander Wang <rander.wang@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [alsa-devel] [PATCH] soundwire: intel: report slave_ids for each
link to SOF driver
On 10-01-20, 16:31, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
>
>
> On 1/10/20 4:00 PM, Pierre-Louis Bossart wrote:
> > From: Bard Liao <yung-chuan.liao@...ux.intel.com>
> >
> > The existing link_mask flag is no longer sufficient to detect the
> > hardware and identify which topology file and a machine driver to load.
> >
> > By reporting the slave_ids exposed in ACPI tables, the parent SOF
> > driver will be able to compare against a set of static configurations.
> >
> > This patch only adds the interface change, the functionality is added
> > in future patches.
>
> Vinod, this patch would need to be shared as an immutable tag for Mark, once
> this is done I can share the SOF parts that make use of the information (cf.
> https://github.com/thesofproject/linux/pull/1692 for reference)
>
> Sorry we missed this in the earlier interface changes, we didn't think we
> would have so many hardware variations so quickly.
do you want the tag now..? I can provide... We are already in -rc6
and i will send PR to greg later this week...
--
~Vinod
Powered by blists - more mailing lists