[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114081751.3wjbbnaem7lbnn3v@pengutronix.de>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 09:17:51 +0100
From: Uwe Kleine-König
<u.kleine-koenig@...gutronix.de>
To: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
Cc: "shawnguo@...nel.org" <shawnguo@...nel.org>,
"s.hauer@...gutronix.de" <s.hauer@...gutronix.de>,
Abel Vesa <abel.vesa@....com>,
Leonard Crestez <leonard.crestez@....com>,
Anson Huang <anson.huang@....com>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
dl-linux-imx <linux-imx@....com>,
"kernel@...gutronix.de" <kernel@...gutronix.de>,
"festevam@...il.com" <festevam@...il.com>,
"linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH] soc: imx: Makefile: only build soc-imx8 when CONFIG_ARM64
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 08:08:45AM +0000, Peng Fan wrote:
> From: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
>
> Only need to build soc-imx8.c when CONFIG_ARM64 defined,
> no need to build it for CONFIG_ARM32 currently.
>
> Signed-off-by: Peng Fan <peng.fan@....com>
> ---
> drivers/soc/imx/Makefile | 2 ++
> 1 file changed, 2 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> index cf9ca42ff739..cfcbc62b11d7 100644
> --- a/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> +++ b/drivers/soc/imx/Makefile
> @@ -1,5 +1,7 @@
> # SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0-only
> obj-$(CONFIG_HAVE_IMX_GPC) += gpc.o
> obj-$(CONFIG_IMX_GPCV2_PM_DOMAINS) += gpcv2.o
> +ifdef CONFIG_ARM64
> obj-$(CONFIG_ARCH_MXC) += soc-imx8.o
> +endif
For earlier SoCs we had kconfig symbols like SOC_IMX25. Actually
SOC_IMX8 would be the right one to decide about soc-imx8.c to be
compiled, it would be easier to read and verify than the suggested
"ARM64 && ARCH_MXC" and it would stay right once NXP presents it's next
64-bit SoC i.MX9.
Best regards
Uwe
--
Pengutronix e.K. | Uwe Kleine-König |
Industrial Linux Solutions | https://www.pengutronix.de/ |
Powered by blists - more mailing lists