linux-kernel - [PATCH 4.14 22/39] Input: add safety guards to input_set

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-Id: <20200114094343.920636759@linuxfoundation.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 11:01:56 +0100
From:   Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
        stable@...r.kernel.org,
        syzbot+c769968809f9359b07aa@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        syzbot+76f3a30e88d256644c78@...kaller.appspotmail.com,
        Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Subject: [PATCH 4.14 22/39] Input: add safety guards to input_set_keycode()

From: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>

commit cb222aed03d798fc074be55e59d9a112338ee784 upstream.

If we happen to have a garbage in input device's keycode table with values
too big we'll end up doing clear_bit() with offset way outside of our
bitmaps, damaging other objects within an input device or even outside of
it. Let's add sanity checks to the returned old keycodes.

Reported-by: syzbot+c769968809f9359b07aa@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Reported-by: syzbot+76f3a30e88d256644c78@...kaller.appspotmail.com
Link: https://lore.kernel.org/r/20191207212757.GA245964@dtor-ws
Signed-off-by: Dmitry Torokhov <dmitry.torokhov@...il.com>
Signed-off-by: Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>

---
 drivers/input/input.c |   26 ++++++++++++++++----------
 1 file changed, 16 insertions(+), 10 deletions(-)

--- a/drivers/input/input.c
+++ b/drivers/input/input.c
@@ -858,16 +858,18 @@ static int input_default_setkeycode(stru
 		}
 	}
 
-	__clear_bit(*old_keycode, dev->keybit);
-	__set_bit(ke->keycode, dev->keybit);
-
-	for (i = 0; i < dev->keycodemax; i++) {
-		if (input_fetch_keycode(dev, i) == *old_keycode) {
-			__set_bit(*old_keycode, dev->keybit);
-			break; /* Setting the bit twice is useless, so break */
+	if (*old_keycode <= KEY_MAX) {
+		__clear_bit(*old_keycode, dev->keybit);
+		for (i = 0; i < dev->keycodemax; i++) {
+			if (input_fetch_keycode(dev, i) == *old_keycode) {
+				__set_bit(*old_keycode, dev->keybit);
+				/* Setting the bit twice is useless, so break */
+				break;
+			}
 		}
 	}
 
+	__set_bit(ke->keycode, dev->keybit);
 	return 0;
 }
 
@@ -923,9 +925,13 @@ int input_set_keycode(struct input_dev *
 	 * Simulate keyup event if keycode is not present
 	 * in the keymap anymore
 	 */
-	if (test_bit(EV_KEY, dev->evbit) &&
-	    !is_event_supported(old_keycode, dev->keybit, KEY_MAX) &&
-	    __test_and_clear_bit(old_keycode, dev->key)) {
+	if (old_keycode > KEY_MAX) {
+		dev_warn(dev->dev.parent ?: &dev->dev,
+			 "%s: got too big old keycode %#x\n",
+			 __func__, old_keycode);
+	} else if (test_bit(EV_KEY, dev->evbit) &&
+		   !is_event_supported(old_keycode, dev->keybit, KEY_MAX) &&
+		   __test_and_clear_bit(old_keycode, dev->key)) {
 		struct input_value vals[] =  {
 			{ EV_KEY, old_keycode, 0 },
 			input_value_sync