[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <95103401-1f2a-556a-2caa-97befcaeb7fc@arm.com>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 10:41:04 +0000
From: Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com>
To: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>, linux-arch@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org
Cc: catalin.marinas@....com, will@...nel.org, paul.burton@...s.com,
salyzyn@...roid.com, 0x7f454c46@...il.com, luto@...nel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 2/8] lib: vdso: Build 32 bit specific functions in the
right context
Hi Thomas,
On 14/01/2020 10:37, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
> Vincenzo Frascino <vincenzo.frascino@....com> writes:
>>
>> On 14/01/2020 09:33, Thomas Gleixner wrote:
>>> Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de> writes:
>>>
>> [...]
>>
>>>
>>> Bah, it's not fixing it. That's what you get when you compile the wrong
>>> tree...
>
> This part is required to cover the BUILD_VDSO32 guard, but then when the
> fallback thing is removed it fails again because the 32bit fallbacks are
> missing.
>
> The patch below makes it build again.
>
I agree. I am testing it now :) Do you prefer to create the patch or shall I do
it once I finish testing?
--
Regards,
Vincenzo
Download attachment "pEpkey.asc" of type "application/pgp-keys" (14072 bytes)
Powered by blists - more mailing lists