linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable clocks required for BT SOC

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <2650b5540448295e767448ddd7662d30@codeaurora.org>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 17:04:35 +0530
From:   bgodavar@...eaurora.org
To:     Matthias Kaehlcke <mka@...omium.org>
Cc:     marcel@...tmann.org, johan.hedberg@...il.com,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-bluetooth@...r.kernel.org,
        hemantg@...eaurora.org, linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        tientzu@...omium.org, seanpaul@...omium.org,
        gubbaven@...eaurora.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v1] Bluetooth: hci_qca: Enable clocks required for BT SOC

Hi Matthias,

sorry missed you mail.
On 2019-12-12 23:13, Matthias Kaehlcke wrote:
> On Thu, Nov 14, 2019 at 01:44:30PM +0530, Balakrishna Godavarthi wrote:
>> Instead of relying on other subsytem to turn ON clocks
>> required for BT SoC to operate, voting them from the driver.
>> 
>> Signed-off-by: Balakrishna Godavarthi <bgodavar@...eaurora.org>
>> ---
>>  drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c | 31 +++++++++++++++++++++++++++++--
>>  1 file changed, 29 insertions(+), 2 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> index f10bdf8e1fc5..dc95e378574b 100644
>> --- a/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> +++ b/drivers/bluetooth/hci_qca.c
>> @@ -164,6 +164,7 @@ struct qca_serdev {
>>  };
>> 
>>  static int qca_regulator_enable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);
>> +static int qca_power_on(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);
>>  static void qca_regulator_disable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev);
>>  static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart *hu);
>>  static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev);
>> @@ -528,7 +529,7 @@ static int qca_open(struct hci_uart *hu)
>>  		} else {
>>  			hu->init_speed = qcadev->init_speed;
>>  			hu->oper_speed = qcadev->oper_speed;
>> -			ret = qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
>> +			ret = qca_power_on(qcadev);
>>  			if (ret) {
>>  				destroy_workqueue(qca->workqueue);
>>  				kfree_skb(qca->rx_skb);
>> @@ -1214,7 +1215,7 @@ static int qca_wcn3990_init(struct hci_uart *hu)
>>  	qcadev = serdev_device_get_drvdata(hu->serdev);
>>  	if (!qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on) {
>>  		serdev_device_close(hu->serdev);
>> -		ret = qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
>> +		ret = qca_power_on(qcadev);
>>  		if (ret)
>>  			return ret;
>> 
>> @@ -1408,6 +1409,9 @@ static void qca_power_shutdown(struct hci_uart 
>> *hu)
>>  	host_set_baudrate(hu, 2400);
>>  	qca_send_power_pulse(hu, false);
>>  	qca_regulator_disable(qcadev);
>> +
>> +	if (qcadev->susclk)
>> +		clk_disable_unprepare(qcadev->susclk);
>>  }
>> 
>>  static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>> @@ -1423,6 +1427,20 @@ static int qca_power_off(struct hci_dev *hdev)
>>  	return 0;
>>  }
>> 
>> +static int qca_power_on(struct qca_serdev *qcadev)
>> +{
>> +	int err;
>> +
>> +	if (qcadev->susclk) {
>> +		err = clk_prepare_enable(qcadev->susclk);
>> +		if (err)
>> +			return err;
>> +	}
>> +
>> +	qca_regulator_enable(qcadev);
>> +	return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>>  static int qca_regulator_enable(struct qca_serdev *qcadev)
>>  {
>>  	struct qca_power *power = qcadev->bt_power;
>> @@ -1523,6 +1541,15 @@ static int qca_serdev_probe(struct 
>> serdev_device *serdev)
>> 
>>  		qcadev->bt_power->vregs_on = false;
>> 
>> +		if (qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3990 ||
>> +		    qcadev->btsoc_type == QCA_WCN3991) {
>> +			qcadev->susclk = devm_clk_get(&serdev->dev, NULL);
>> +			if (IS_ERR(qcadev->susclk)) {
>> +				dev_err(&serdev->dev, "failed to acquire clk\n");
>> +				return PTR_ERR(qcadev->susclk);
>> +			}
> 
> This will break existing users. Use devm_clk_get_optional() and at most
> raise a warning if the clock doesn't exist.
> 
> It would also be nice to add the clock to the affected devices in the 
> tree
> if possible:
> 
[Bala]: Sure we will use devm_clk_get_optional() in the next patch.

We will check the effected areas and update the necessary as i see some 
projects are not existing.

> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-clamshell.dtsi:
> compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/msm8998-mtp.dtsi:              compatible =
> "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/qcs404-evb.dtsi:               compatible =
> "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-cheza.dtsi:             compatible =
> "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm845-db845c.dts:             compatible =
> "qcom,wcn3990-bt";
> arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sdm850-lenovo-yoga-c630.dts:
> compatible = "qcom,wcn3990-bt";