lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:38:34 +0100
From:   Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To:     Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc:     Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
        "H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
        kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/amd: fix uninitalized structure cp

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:15:05AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
> 
> In the case where cp is not assigned to the return from
> the call to find_microcode_in_initrd

Where does this happen? I don't see it.

> cp is uninitialized when
> it is assigned to *ret.   Functions that call __load_ucode_amd
> such as load_ucode_amd_bsp can therefore end up checking bogus
> values cp.data and cp.size.  Fix this by ensuring cp is
> initialized as all zero and remove the redundant initialization
> of cp in load_ucode_amd_bsp.
> 
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")

I already asked about those: either document what those tags mean or
remove them.

-- 
Regards/Gruss,
    Boris.

https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ