[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114113834.GE31032@zn.tnic>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 12:38:34 +0100
From: Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>
To: Colin King <colin.king@...onical.com>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
"H . Peter Anvin" <hpa@...or.com>, x86@...nel.org,
kernel-janitors@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] x86/microcode/amd: fix uninitalized structure cp
On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 11:15:05AM +0000, Colin King wrote:
> From: Colin Ian King <colin.king@...onical.com>
>
> In the case where cp is not assigned to the return from
> the call to find_microcode_in_initrd
Where does this happen? I don't see it.
> cp is uninitialized when
> it is assigned to *ret. Functions that call __load_ucode_amd
> such as load_ucode_amd_bsp can therefore end up checking bogus
> values cp.data and cp.size. Fix this by ensuring cp is
> initialized as all zero and remove the redundant initialization
> of cp in load_ucode_amd_bsp.
>
> Addresses-Coverity: ("Uninitialized scalar variable")
I already asked about those: either document what those tags mean or
remove them.
--
Regards/Gruss,
Boris.
https://people.kernel.org/tglx/notes-about-netiquette
Powered by blists - more mailing lists