linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <7d0eadb4-5712-6fa1-f50f-f8ea6d8aea43@toxicpanda.com>
Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 05:44:33 -0800
From:   Josef Bacik <josef@...icpanda.com>
To:     Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...auone-net.jp>,
        linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org
Cc:     linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] btrfs: Implement lazytime

On 1/14/20 12:53 AM, Kusanagi Kouichi wrote:
> I tested with xfstests and lazytime didn't cause any new failures.
> 
> Signed-off-by: Kusanagi Kouichi <slash@...auone-net.jp>
> ---

We don't use the I_DIRTY flags for tracking our inodes, and .write_inode was 
removed because we didn't need it and it deadlocks.  Thanks,

Josef