Date:   Tue, 14 Jan 2020 21:46:26 +0800
From:   Zhou Yanjie <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
To:     Jiaxun Yang <jiaxun.yang@...goat.com>,
        "linux-mips@...r.kernel.org" <linux-mips@...r.kernel.org>
Cc:     "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "devicetree@...r.kernel.org" <devicetree@...r.kernel.org>,
        "robh+dt@...nel.org" <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        "paul.burton@...s.com" <paul.burton@...s.com>,
        "paulburton@...nel.org" <paulburton@...nel.org>,
        "jhogan@...nel.org" <jhogan@...nel.org>,
        "miquel.raynal@...tlin.com" <miquel.raynal@...tlin.com>,
        "mark.rutland@....com" <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "syq@...ian.org" <syq@...ian.org>,
        "ralf@...ux-mips.org" <ralf@...ux-mips.org>,
        "tglx@...utronix.de" <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        "jason@...edaemon.net" <jason@...edaemon.net>,
        "maz@...nel.org" <maz@...nel.org>,
        "chenhc@...ote.com" <chenhc@...ote.com>,
        "daniel.lezcano@...aro.org" <daniel.lezcano@...aro.org>,
        "ebiederm@...ssion.com" <ebiederm@...ssion.com>,
        "keescook@...omium.org" <keescook@...omium.org>,
        "ak@...ux.intel.com" <ak@...ux.intel.com>,
        "krzk@...nel.org" <krzk@...nel.org>,
        "paul@...pouillou.net" <paul@...pouillou.net>,
        "prasannatsmkumar@...il.com" <prasannatsmkumar@...il.com>,
        "sernia.zhou@...mail.com" <sernia.zhou@...mail.com>,
        "zhenwenjin@...il.com" <zhenwenjin@...il.com>,
        "H. Nikolaus Schaller" <hns@...delico.com>,
        Paul Boddie <paul@...die.org.uk>,
        MIPS Creator CI20 Development 
        <mips-creator-ci20-dev@...glegroups.com>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 1/6] MIPS: JZ4780: Introduce SMP support.

Hi Jiaxun,

On 2020年01月14日 12:55, Jiaxun Yang wrote:
>
> 14.01.2020, 00:44, "周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie)" <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>:
>> Forward port smp support from kernel 3.18.3 of CI20_linux
>> to upstream kernel 5.5.
>>
>> Signed-off-by: 周琰杰 (Zhou Yanjie) <zhouyanjie@...yeetech.com>
>> ---
>>   arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4780-smp.h | 91 ++++++++
>>   arch/mips/jz4740/Kconfig | 3 +
>>   arch/mips/jz4740/Makefile | 5 +
>>   arch/mips/jz4740/prom.c | 4 +
>>   arch/mips/jz4740/smp-entry.S | 57 +++++
>>   arch/mips/jz4740/smp.c | 300 +++++++++++++++++++++++++
>>   arch/mips/kernel/idle.c | 14 +-
>>   drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c | 21 ++
>>   8 files changed, 494 insertions(+), 1 deletion(-)
>>   create mode 100644 arch/mips/include/asm/mach-jz4740/jz4780-smp.h
>>   create mode 100644 arch/mips/jz4740/smp-entry.S
>>   create mode 100644 arch/mips/jz4740/smp.c
> Hi 周琰杰:
>
> Thanks for your work! See my review comments below
>
>
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/jz4740/smp.c b/arch/mips/jz4740/smp.c
>> new file mode 100644
>> index 00000000..d36e0b2
>> --- /dev/null
>> +++ b/arch/mips/jz4740/smp.c
>> @@ -0,0 +1,300 @@
>> +// SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
>> +/*
>> + * Copyright (C) 2013, Paul Burton <paul.burton@...tec.com>
>> + * JZ4780 SMP
>> + */
>> +
>> +#include <linux/clk.h>
>> +#include <linux/interrupt.h>
>> +#include <linux/of.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched.h>
>> +#include <linux/sched/task_stack.h>
>> +#include <linux/smp.h>
>> +#include <linux/tick.h>
>> +#include <asm/mach-jz4740/jz4780-smp.h>
>> +#include <asm/r4kcache.h>
>> +#include <asm/smp-ops.h>
>> +
>> +static struct clk *cpu_clock_gates[CONFIG_NR_CPUS] = { NULL };
>> +
>> +u32 jz4780_cpu_entry_sp;
>> +u32 jz4780_cpu_entry_gp;
>> +
>> +static struct cpumask cpu_running;
>> +
>> +static DEFINE_SPINLOCK(smp_lock);
>> +
>> +extern void (*r4k_blast_dcache)(void);
>> +
>> +/*
>> + * The Ingenic jz4780 SMP variant has to write back dirty cache lines before
>> + * executing wait. The CPU & cache clock will be gated until we return from
>> + * the wait, and if another core attempts to access data from our data cache
>> + * during this time then it will lock up.
>> + */
>> +void jz4780_smp_wait_irqoff(void)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long pending = read_c0_cause() & read_c0_status() & CAUSEF_IP;
>> +
>> + /*
>> + * Going to idle has a significant overhead due to the cache flush so
>> + * try to avoid it if we'll immediately be woken again due to an IRQ.
>> + */
>> + if (!need_resched() && !pending) {
>> + r4k_blast_dcache();
>> +
>> + __asm__(
>> + " .set push \n"
>> + " .set mips3 \n"
>> + " sync \n"
>> + " wait \n"
>> + " .set pop \n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + local_irq_enable();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static irqreturn_t mbox_handler(int irq, void *dev_id)
>> +{
>> + int cpu = smp_processor_id();
>> + u32 action, status;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&smp_lock);
>> +
>> + switch (cpu) {
>> + case 0:
>> + action = read_c0_mailbox0();
>> + write_c0_mailbox0(0);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + action = read_c0_mailbox1();
>> + write_c0_mailbox1(0);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + panic("unhandled cpu %d!", cpu);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* clear pending mailbox interrupt */
>> + status = read_c0_corestatus();
>> + status &= ~(CORESTATUS_MIRQ0P << cpu);
>> + write_c0_corestatus(status);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&smp_lock);
>> +
>> + if (action & SMP_RESCHEDULE_YOURSELF)
>> + scheduler_ipi();
>> + if (action & SMP_CALL_FUNCTION)
>> + generic_smp_call_function_interrupt();
>> +
>> + return IRQ_HANDLED;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct irqaction mbox_action = {
>> + .handler = mbox_handler,
>> + .name = "core mailbox",
>> + .flags = IRQF_PERCPU | IRQF_NO_THREAD,
>> +};
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_smp_setup(void)
>> +{
>> + u32 addr, reim;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + reim = read_c0_reim();
>> +
>> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < NR_CPUS; cpu++) {
>> + __cpu_number_map[cpu] = cpu;
>> + __cpu_logical_map[cpu] = cpu;
>> + set_cpu_possible(cpu, true);
>> + }
>> +
>> + /* mask mailbox interrupts for this core */
>> + reim &= ~REIM_MBOXIRQ0M;
>> + write_c0_reim(reim);
>> +
>> + /* clear mailboxes & pending mailbox IRQs */
>> + write_c0_mailbox0(0);
>> + write_c0_mailbox1(0);
>> + write_c0_corestatus(0);
>> +
>> + /* set reset entry point */
>> + addr = KSEG1ADDR((u32)&jz4780_secondary_cpu_entry);
>> + WARN_ON(addr & ~REIM_ENTRY);
>> + reim &= ~REIM_ENTRY;
>> + reim |= addr & REIM_ENTRY;
>> +
>> + /* unmask mailbox interrupts for this core */
>> + reim |= REIM_MBOXIRQ0M;
>> + write_c0_reim(reim);
>> + set_c0_status(STATUSF_IP3);
> Only IP3? Could other interrupt be routed to this core?

The original source code used STATUSF_IP3, but it work properly after 
changing it to ST0_IM. In the next version, I will replace STATUSF_IP3 
with ST0_IM

>> + irq_enable_hazard();
>> +
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_running);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_smp_prepare_cpus(unsigned int max_cpus)
>> +{
>> + struct device_node *cpu_node;
>> + unsigned cpu, ctrl;
>> + int err;
>> +
>> + /* setup the mailbox IRQ */
>> + setup_irq(MIPS_CPU_IRQ_BASE + 3, &mbox_action);
>> +
>> + init_cpu_present(cpu_possible_mask);
>> +
>> + ctrl = read_c0_corectrl();
>> +
>> + for (cpu = 0; cpu < max_cpus; cpu++) {
>> + /* use reset entry point from REIM register */
>> + ctrl |= CORECTRL_RPC0 << cpu;
>> + }
>> +
>> + for_each_compatible_node(cpu_node, NULL, "ingenic,xburst") {
>> + err = of_property_read_u32_index(cpu_node, "reg", 0, &cpu);
>> + if (err) {
>> + pr_err("Failed to read index of %s\n",
>> + cpu_node->full_name);
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + cpu_clock_gates[cpu] = of_clk_get(cpu_node, 0);
>> + if (IS_ERR(cpu_clock_gates[cpu])) {
>> + cpu_clock_gates[cpu] = NULL;
>> + continue;
>> + }
>> +
>> + err = clk_prepare(cpu_clock_gates[cpu]);
>> + if (err)
>> + pr_err("Failed to prepare CPU clock gate\n");
>> + }
>> +
>> + write_c0_corectrl(ctrl);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static int jz4780_boot_secondary(int cpu, struct task_struct *idle)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + u32 ctrl;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&smp_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + /* ensure the core is in reset */
>> + ctrl = read_c0_corectrl();
>> + ctrl |= CORECTRL_SWRST0 << cpu;
>> + write_c0_corectrl(ctrl);
>> +
>> + /* ungate core clock */
>> + if (cpu_clock_gates[cpu])
>> + clk_enable(cpu_clock_gates[cpu]);
>> +
>> + /* power up the core */
>> + {
>> + void __iomem *lpcr = (void __iomem *)0xb0000004;
>> + void __iomem *clkgr1 = (void __iomem *)0xb0000028;
> Please avoid raw address pointer. If it's clock related, should we make a clk
> driver for it? Or add a SMP controller node in DeviceTree for that address?
> At least define a macro for it.

Sure, will change it in v2.

>
>> +
>> + writel(readl(lpcr) & ~BIT(31), lpcr);
>> + writel(readl(clkgr1) & ~BIT(15), clkgr1);
> The same, bits need macros. Otherwise, it's too hard for others to read.

Sure, will change it in v2.

>> +
>> + /* wait for the CPU to be powered up */
>> + while (readl(lpcr) & BIT(27))
>> + ;
> Should we add a timeout check to avoid a dead loop?

Sure, I'll add a timeout check in next version.

>> + }
>> +
>> + /* set entry sp/gp register values */
>> + jz4780_cpu_entry_sp = __KSTK_TOS(idle);
>> + jz4780_cpu_entry_gp = (u32)task_thread_info(idle);
>> + smp_wmb();
>> +
>> + /* take the core out of reset */
>> + ctrl &= ~(CORECTRL_SWRST0 << cpu);
>> + write_c0_corectrl(ctrl);
>> +
>> + cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, &cpu_running);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smp_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + return 0;
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_init_secondary(void)
>> +{
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_smp_finish(void)
>> +{
>> + u32 reim;
>> +
>> + spin_lock(&smp_lock);
>> +
>> + /* unmask mailbox interrupts for this core */
>> + reim = read_c0_reim();
>> + reim |= REIM_MBOXIRQ0M << smp_processor_id();
>> + write_c0_reim(reim);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock(&smp_lock);
>> +
>> + /* unmask interrupts for this core */
>> + change_c0_status(ST0_IM, STATUSF_IP3 | STATUSF_IP2 |
>> + STATUSF_IP1 | STATUSF_IP0);
>> + irq_enable_hazard();
>> +
>> + /* force broadcast timer */
>> + tick_broadcast_force();
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_send_ipi_single_locked(int cpu, unsigned int action)
>> +{
>> + u32 mbox;
>> +
>> + switch (cpu) {
>> + case 0:
>> + mbox = read_c0_mailbox0();
>> + write_c0_mailbox0(mbox | action);
>> + break;
>> + case 1:
>> + mbox = read_c0_mailbox1();
>> + write_c0_mailbox1(mbox | action);
>> + break;
>> + default:
>> + panic("unhandled cpu %d!", cpu);
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_send_ipi_single(int cpu, unsigned int action)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&smp_lock, flags);
>> + jz4780_send_ipi_single_locked(cpu, action);
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smp_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static void jz4780_send_ipi_mask(const struct cpumask *mask,
>> + unsigned int action)
>> +{
>> + unsigned long flags;
>> + int cpu;
>> +
>> + spin_lock_irqsave(&smp_lock, flags);
>> +
>> + for_each_cpu(cpu, mask)
>> + jz4780_send_ipi_single_locked(cpu, action);
>> +
>> + spin_unlock_irqrestore(&smp_lock, flags);
>> +}
>> +
>> +static struct plat_smp_ops jz4780_smp_ops = {
>> + .send_ipi_single = jz4780_send_ipi_single,
>> + .send_ipi_mask = jz4780_send_ipi_mask,
>> + .init_secondary = jz4780_init_secondary,
>> + .smp_finish = jz4780_smp_finish,
>> + .boot_secondary = jz4780_boot_secondary,
>> + .smp_setup = jz4780_smp_setup,
>> + .prepare_cpus = jz4780_smp_prepare_cpus,
>> +};
>> +
>> +void jz4780_smp_init(void)
>> +{
>> + register_smp_ops(&jz4780_smp_ops);
>> +}
>> diff --git a/arch/mips/kernel/idle.c b/arch/mips/kernel/idle.c
>> index 37f8e78..a406de3 100644
>> --- a/arch/mips/kernel/idle.c
>> +++ b/arch/mips/kernel/idle.c
>> @@ -19,6 +19,10 @@
>>   #include <asm/idle.h>
>>   #include <asm/mipsregs.h>
>>
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_MACH_JZ4780
>> +# include <asm/mach-jz4740/jz4780-smp.h>
>> +#endif
>> +
>>   /*
>>    * Not all of the MIPS CPUs have the "wait" instruction available. Moreover,
>>    * the implementation of the "wait" feature differs between CPU families. This
>> @@ -172,7 +176,6 @@ void __init check_wait(void)
>>           case CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON_PLUS:
>>           case CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON2:
>>           case CPU_CAVIUM_OCTEON3:
>> - case CPU_XBURST:
>>           case CPU_LOONGSON32:
>>           case CPU_XLR:
>>           case CPU_XLP:
>> @@ -246,6 +249,15 @@ void __init check_wait(void)
>>                      cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
>>                    */
>>                   break;
>> + case CPU_XBURST:
>> +#if defined(CONFIG_MACH_JZ4780) && defined(CONFIG_SMP)
>> + if (NR_CPUS > 1)
>> + cpu_wait = jz4780_smp_wait_irqoff;
>> + else
>> + cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
>> +#else
>> + cpu_wait = r4k_wait;
>> +#endif
>>           default:
>>                   break;
>>           }
>> diff --git a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> index 01d18b3..56a9648 100644
>> --- a/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> +++ b/drivers/irqchip/irq-ingenic.c
>> @@ -17,6 +17,7 @@
>>   #include <linux/delay.h>
>>
>>   #include <asm/io.h>
>> +#include <asm/mipsregs.h>
>>   #include <asm/mach-jz4740/irq.h>
>>
>>   struct ingenic_intc_data {
>> @@ -32,6 +33,26 @@ struct ingenic_intc_data {
>>   #define JZ_REG_INTC_PENDING 0x10
>>   #define CHIP_SIZE 0x20
>>
>> +asmlinkage void plat_irq_dispatch(void)
>> +{
>> + uint32_t pending = read_c0_cause() & read_c0_status() & CAUSEF_IP;
>> +
>> + if (pending & CAUSEF_IP4) {
>> + /* from OS timer */
>> + do_IRQ(4);
>> +#ifdef CONFIG_SMP
>> + } else if (pending & CAUSEF_IP3) {
>> + /* from a mailbox write */
>> + do_IRQ(3);
>> +#endif
>> + } else if (pending & CAUSEF_IP2) {
>> + /* from interrupt controller */
>> + do_IRQ(2);
>> + } else {
>> + spurious_interrupt();
>> + }
>> +}
>> +
> Why we need this? irq-mips-cpu driver is doing the same thing.

OK, I will remove it in next version.

Thanks and best regards!

>>   static irqreturn_t intc_cascade(int irq, void *data)
>>   {
>>           struct ingenic_intc_data *intc = irq_get_handler_data(irq);
>> --
>> 2.7.4
> Thanks.
>
> --
> Jiaxun Yang

Powered by blists - more mailing lists