[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200114150353.GP3137@piout.net>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 16:03:53 +0100
From: Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To: Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com
Cc: robh+dt@...nel.org, lee.jones@...aro.org, mark.rutland@....com,
Nicolas.Ferre@...rochip.com, Ludovic.Desroches@...rochip.com,
radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...il.com,
a.zummo@...ertech.it, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v3 4/7] dt-bindings: atmel-usart: remove wildcard
On 14/01/2020 14:58:23+0000, Claudiu.Beznea@...rochip.com wrote:
> > Then, what is the point of adding microchip,sam9x60-dbgu ?
>
> Different meaning for CIDR register bits. Version is kept on bits 4 to 0
> but not documented in public datasheet, so version displayed by
> drivers/soc/atmel/soc.c should work.
But at91_get_cidr_exid_from_dbgu will not find the node unless you use
two fallbacks.
--
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com
Powered by blists - more mailing lists