[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115190744.GA2628@lst.de>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 20:07:44 +0100
From: Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>
To: Waiman Long <longman@...hat.com>
Cc: Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Christoph Hellwig <hch@....de>, linux-xfs@...r.kernel.org,
linux-fsdevel@...r.kernel.org,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
linux-ext4@...r.kernel.org, cluster-devel@...hat.com,
linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, linux-mm@...ck.org
Subject: Re: RFC: hold i_rwsem until aio completes
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 02:03:22PM -0500, Waiman Long wrote:
> >> (1) no unlocking by another process than the one that acquired it
> >> (2) no return to userspace with locks held
> > As an example flow: obtain the read side lock, schedual a work queue,
> > return to user space, and unlock the read side from the work queue.
>
> We currently have down_read_non_owner() and up_read_non_owner() that
> perform the lock and unlock without lockdep tracking. Of course, that is
> a hack and their use must be carefully scrutinized to make sure that
> there is no deadlock or other potentially locking issues.
That doesn't help with returning to userspace while the lock is held.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists