linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Enable QDSS clock on sm8150

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200115191945.GM1214176@minitux>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 11:19:45 -0800
From:   Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org>
To:     Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>
Cc:     Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>, devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        netdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>,
        Andy Gross <agross@...nel.org>, ath10k@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-arm-msm@...r.kernel.org,
        "David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>
Subject: Re: [PATCH 0/2] ath10k: Enable QDSS clock on sm8150

On Wed 15 Jan 01:04 PST 2020, Kalle Valo wrote:

> Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org> writes:
> 
> > Bjorn Andersson <bjorn.andersson@...aro.org> writes:
> >
> >> On SM8150 the WiFi firmware depends on the QDSS clock ticking, or the system
> >> will reset due to an NoC error. So this adds an optional clock to the ath10k
> >> binding and makes sure it's enabled while the WiFi firmware needs it.
> >>
> >> Bjorn Andersson (2):
> >>   ath10k: Add optional qdss clk
> >>   arm64: dts: qcom: sm8150: Specify qdss clock for wifi
> >>
> >>  .../devicetree/bindings/net/wireless/qcom,ath10k.txt          | 2 +-
> >>  arch/arm64/boot/dts/qcom/sm8150.dtsi                          | 4 ++--
> >>  drivers/net/wireless/ath/ath10k/snoc.c                        | 2 +-
> >>  3 files changed, 4 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
> >
> > Via which tree are these supposed to go? I'll take patch 1 and arm
> > mantainers take patch 2, or what?

That sounds good (you take the ath10k and we'll take the dts).

> 
> No reply, so I'm planning to take patch 1. Please holler if I
> misunderstood.
> 

Sorry.

Regards,
Bjorn