[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115212106.GD28904@ravnborg.org>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:21:06 +0100
From: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
To: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
Cc: Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>,
David Airlie <airlied@...ux.ie>,
Daniel Vetter <daniel@...ll.ch>,
Matthias Brugger <matthias.bgg@...il.com>,
dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mediatek@...ts.infradead.org, srv_heupstream@...iatek.com,
yingjoe.chen@...iatek.com, eddie.huang@...iatek.com,
cawa.cheng@...iatek.com, bibby.hsieh@...iatek.com,
ck.hu@...iatek.com, stonea168@....com
Subject: Re: [PATCH v8 1/8] dt-bindings: display: panel: Add BOE tv101wum-n16
panel bindings
Hi Jitao.
A few comments that I missed in last round.
Please consider to combine the three panels in one binding.
I realise they are almost identical so no need for three binding files.
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 09:59:51PM +0800, Jitao Shi wrote:
> Add documentation for boe tv101wum-n16 panel.
>
> Signed-off-by: Jitao Shi <jitao.shi@...iatek.com>
> Reviewed-by: Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> ---
> .../display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml | 74 +++++++++++++++++++
> 1 file changed, 74 insertions(+)
> create mode 100644 Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
>
> diff --git a/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
> new file mode 100644
> index 000000000000..d38aee22d406
> --- /dev/null
> +++ b/Documentation/devicetree/bindings/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml
> @@ -0,0 +1,74 @@
> +# SPDX-License-Identifier: GPL-2.0
Please use (GPL-2.0-only OR BSD-2-Clause) for all new bindings.
(Sorry if this was not part of my previous feedback)
Sam
> +%YAML 1.2
> +---
> +$id: http://devicetree.org/schemas/display/panel/boe,tv101wum-nl6.yaml#
> +$schema: http://devicetree.org/meta-schemas/core.yaml#
> +
> +title: BOE TV101WUM-Nl6 DSI Display Panel
> +
> +maintainers:
> + - Thierry Reding <thierry.reding@...il.com>
> + - Sam Ravnborg <sam@...nborg.org>
> + - Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
Rob is not a typical maintainer of panel bindings.
The fallback it Thierry and me.
But if you have agreed this with Rob then all is good.
> +
> +allOf:
> + - $ref: panel-common.yaml#
> +
> +properties:
> + compatible:
> + const: boe,tv101wum-nl6
> +
> + reg:
> + description: the virtual channel number of a DSI peripheral
> +
> + enable-gpios:
> + description: a GPIO spec for the enable pin
> +
> + pp1800-supply:
> + description: core voltage supply
> +
> + avdd-supply:
> + description: phandle of the regulator that provides positive voltage
> +
> + avee-supply:
> + description: phandle of the regulator that provides negative voltage
> +
> + backlight:
> + description: phandle of the backlight device attached to the panel
> +
> + port: true
> +
> +required:
> + - compatible
> + - reg
> + - enable-gpios
> + - pp1800-supply
> + - avdd-supply
> + - avee-supply
> + - backlight
I would be suprised if backlight is a required node.
You could always tie the input to a fixed voltage and then no backlight
node are required.
Please remove from the required list unless you can convince me
otherwise.
Sam
> +
> +additionalProperties: false
> +
> +examples:
> + - |
> + dsi {
> + #address-cells = <1>;
> + #size-cells = <0>;
> + panel@0 {
> + compatible = "boe,tv101wum-nl6";
> + reg = <0>;
> + enable-gpios = <&pio 45 0>;
> + avdd-supply = <&ppvarn_lcd>;
> + avee-supply = <&ppvarp_lcd>;
> + pp1800-supply = <&pp1800_lcd>;
> + backlight = <&backlight_lcd0>;
> + status = "okay";
> + port {
> + panel_in: endpoint {
> + remote-endpoint = <&dsi_out>;
> + };
> + };
> + };
> + };
> +
> +...
> --
> 2.21.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists