[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <87r200tlqv.fsf@toke.dk>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:09:44 +0100
From: Toke Høiland-Jørgensen <toke@...hat.com>
To: Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com>
Cc: Alexei Starovoitov <ast@...nel.org>,
Daniel Borkmann <daniel@...earbox.net>,
Martin KaFai Lau <kafai@...com>,
Song Liu <songliubraving@...com>, Yonghong Song <yhs@...com>,
Andrii Nakryiko <andriin@...com>,
Doug Ledford <dledford@...hat.com>,
Jason Gunthorpe <jgg@...pe.ca>,
"David S. Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jakub Kicinski <jakub.kicinski@...ronome.com>,
Jesper Dangaard Brouer <brouer@...hat.com>,
John Fastabend <john.fastabend@...il.com>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>,
Arnaldo Carvalho de Melo <acme@...nel.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Alexander Shishkin <alexander.shishkin@...ux.intel.com>,
Jiri Olsa <jolsa@...hat.com>,
Namhyung Kim <namhyung@...nel.org>,
Shuah Khan <shuah@...nel.org>, netdev@...r.kernel.org,
bpf@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
linux-rdma@...r.kernel.org, linux-kselftest@...r.kernel.org,
clang-built-linux@...glegroups.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH bpf-next v2 00/10] tools: Use consistent libbpf include paths everywhere
Alexei Starovoitov <alexei.starovoitov@...il.com> writes:
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 03:12:48PM +0100, Toke Høiland-Jørgensen wrote:
>> The recent commit 6910d7d3867a ("selftests/bpf: Ensure bpf_helper_defs.h are
>> taken from selftests dir") broke compilation against libbpf if it is installed
>> on the system, and $INCLUDEDIR/bpf is not in the include path.
>>
>> Since having the bpf/ subdir of $INCLUDEDIR in the include path has never been a
>> requirement for building against libbpf before, this needs to be fixed. One
>> option is to just revert the offending commit and figure out a different way to
>> achieve what it aims for. However, this series takes a different approach:
>> Changing all in-tree users of libbpf to consistently use a bpf/ prefix in
>> #include directives for header files from libbpf.
>
> I don't think such approach will work in all cases.
> Consider the user installing libbpf headers into /home/somebody/include/bpf/,
> passing that path to -I and trying to build bpf progs
> that do #include "bpf_helpers.h"...
> In the current shape of libbpf everything will compile fine,
> but after patch 8 of this series the compiler will not find bpf/bpf_helper_defs.h.
> So I think we have no choice, but to revert that part of Andrii's patch.
> Note that doing #include "" for additional library headers is a common practice.
> There was nothing wrong about #include "bpf_helper_defs.h" in bpf_helpers.h.
OK, I'll take another look at that bit and see if I can get it to work
with #include "bpf_helper_defs.h" and still function with the read-only
tree (and avoid stale headers).
-Toke
Powered by blists - more mailing lists