[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <3908561D78D1C84285E8C5FCA982C28F7F52799E@ORSMSX115.amr.corp.intel.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:48:15 +0000
From: "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To: "Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
CC: Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
"Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
"Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
"Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by
kernel
>> All comments accepted and code changed ... except for these three:
>
> Sounds like you're also writing code, in which case you should give
> yourself credit with your own Co-developed-by: tag.
I just fixed some typos in PeterZ's untested example patch. Now changed
a few names as per your suggestions. I don't' really think of that as "writing code".
-Tony
Powered by blists - more mailing lists