linux-kernel - RE: [PATCH v11] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by kernel

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite for Android: free password hash cracker in your pocket

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 23:48:15 +0000
From:   "Luck, Tony" <tony.luck@...el.com>
To:     "Christopherson, Sean J" <sean.j.christopherson@...el.com>
CC:     Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        "Yu, Fenghua" <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
        Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...hat.com>, Borislav Petkov <bp@...en8.de>,
        H Peter Anvin <hpa@...or.com>,
        "Raj, Ashok" <ashok.raj@...el.com>,
        "Shankar, Ravi V" <ravi.v.shankar@...el.com>,
        linux-kernel <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>, x86 <x86@...nel.org>
Subject: RE: [PATCH v11] x86/split_lock: Enable split lock detection by
 kernel

>> All comments accepted and code changed ... except for these three:
>
> Sounds like you're also writing code, in which case you should give
> yourself credit with your own Co-developed-by: tag.

I just fixed some typos in PeterZ's untested example patch. Now changed
a few names as per your suggestions. I don't' really think of that as "writing code".

-Tony