lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115084300.GU3137@piout.net>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:43:00 +0100
From:   Alexandre Belloni <alexandre.belloni@...tlin.com>
To:     Lee Jones <lee.jones@...aro.org>
Cc:     Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>, robh+dt@...nel.org,
        mark.rutland@....com, nicolas.ferre@...rochip.com,
        ludovic.desroches@...rochip.com, vkoul@...nel.org,
        eugen.hristev@...rochip.com, jic23@...nel.org, knaack.h@....de,
        lars@...afoo.de, pmeerw@...erw.net, mchehab@...nel.org,
        radu_nicolae.pirea@....ro, richard.genoud@...il.com,
        tudor.ambarus@...rochip.com, miquel.raynal@...tlin.com,
        richard@....at, vigneshr@...com, wg@...ndegger.com,
        mkl@...gutronix.de, a.zummo@...ertech.it,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org, linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, dmaengine@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-iio@...r.kernel.org, linux-media@...r.kernel.org,
        linux-spi@...r.kernel.org, linux-mtd@...ts.infradead.org,
        linux-can@...r.kernel.org, linux-rtc@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH v2 10/17] dt-bindings: atmel-smc: add
 microchip,sam9x60-smc

On 15/01/2020 08:00:53+0000, Lee Jones wrote:
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020, Alexandre Belloni wrote:
> 
> > On 10/01/2020 18:18:02+0200, Claudiu Beznea wrote:
> > > Add microchip,sam9x60-smc to DT bindings documentation.
> > > 
> > > Signed-off-by: Claudiu Beznea <claudiu.beznea@...rochip.com>
> > > ---
> > >  Documentation/devicetree/bindings/mfd/atmel-smc.txt | 1 +
> > >  1 file changed, 1 insertion(+)
> > Applied, thanks.
> 
> Remind me why you are applying this patch please?
> 

Because the last patch of the series has a soft dependency on this
patch. I can remove it from the at91 and let you apply it if you think
this is necessary.


-- 
Alexandre Belloni, Bootlin
Embedded Linux and Kernel engineering
https://bootlin.com

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ