| lists.openwall.net | lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC | |
|
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
| ||
|
Message-ID: <CAJMQK-jES7NOAga3w+pQUuoFW+dm0Uw3--SQ7S0BAARFCrT6qQ@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 19:34:17 +0800
From: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
To: "Rafael J. Wysocki" <rafael@...nel.org>
Cc: Thomas Gleixner <tglx@...utronix.de>,
Josh Poimboeuf <jpoimboe@...hat.com>,
Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
Jiri Kosina <jkosina@...e.cz>,
Pavankumar Kondeti <pkondeti@...eaurora.org>,
Vitaly Kuznetsov <vkuznets@...hat.com>,
Aaro Koskinen <aaro.koskinen@...ia.com>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Will Deacon <will@...nel.org>,
Fenghua Yu <fenghua.yu@...el.com>,
James Morse <james.morse@....com>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
Heiko Carstens <heiko.carstens@...ibm.com>,
Guenter Roeck <groeck@...omium.org>,
Stephen Boyd <swboyd@...omium.org>,
Linux Kernel Mailing List <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Linux ARM <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
linux-csky@...r.kernel.org, linux-ia64@...r.kernel.org,
linux-mips@...r.kernel.org, linux-parisc@...r.kernel.org,
linuxppc-dev <linuxppc-dev@...ts.ozlabs.org>,
linux-s390@...r.kernel.org,
Linux-sh list <linux-sh@...r.kernel.org>,
sparclinux@...r.kernel.org, linux-xtensa@...ux-xtensa.org,
Linux PM <linux-pm@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [PATCH v5] reboot: support offline CPUs before reboot
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 5:49 PM Rafael J. Wysocki <rafael@...nel.org> wrote:
>
> On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:35 AM Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org> wrote:
> >
> > Currently system reboots uses architecture specific codes (smp_send_stop)
> > to offline non reboot CPUs. Most architecture's implementation is looping
> > through all non reboot online CPUs and call ipi function to each of them. Some
> > architecture like arm64, arm, and x86... would set offline masks to cpu without
> > really offline them. This causes some race condition and kernel warning comes
> > out sometimes when system reboots.
> >
> > This patch adds a config ARCH_OFFLINE_CPUS_ON_REBOOT, which would offline cpus in
> > migrate_to_reboot_cpu(). If non reboot cpus are all offlined here, the loop for
> > checking online cpus would be an empty loop. If architecture don't enable this
> > config, or some cpus somehow fails to offline, it would fallback to ipi
> > function.
> >
> > Opt in this config for architectures that support CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU.
> >
> > Signed-off-by: Hsin-Yi Wang <hsinyi@...omium.org>
> > ---
> > Change from v4:
> > * fix a few nits: naming, comments, remove Kconfig text...
> >
> > Change from v3:
> > * Opt in config for architectures that support CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
> > * Merge function offline_secondary_cpus() and freeze_secondary_cpus()
> > with an additional flag.
>
> This does not seem to be a very good idea, since
> freeze_secondary_cpus() does much more than you need for reboot.
>
> For reboot, you basically only need to do something like this AFAICS:
>
> cpu_maps_update_begin();
>
> for_each_online_cpu(i) {
> if (i != cpu)
> _cpu_down(i, 1, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
> }
> cpu_hotplug_disabled++;
>
> cpu_maps_update_done();
>
> And you may put this into a function defined outside of CONFIG_PM_SLEEP.
>
v2's implementation is similar to this. The conclusion in v2[1] is
that since these 2 functions are similar, we should merge them. I'm
fine both ways but slightly prefer v2's. Maybe wait for others to
comment?
[1] https://lore.kernel.org/lkml/87muarpcwm.fsf@vitty.brq.redhat.com/
> >
> > Change from v2:
> > * Add another config instead of configed by CONFIG_HOTPLUG_CPU
>
> So why exactly is this new Kconfig option needed?
>
> Everybody supporting CPU hotplug seems to opt in anyway.
>
Currently we opt-in for all arch that supports HOTPLUG_CPU, but if
some arch decides that this would make reboot slow (or maybe other
reasons), they can choose to opt-out.
I have only tested on arm64 and x86 for now.
> [cut]
>
> >
> > -int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
> > +int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary, bool reboot)
> > {
> > int cpu, error = 0;
> >
> > @@ -1237,11 +1237,13 @@ int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
> > if (cpu == primary)
> > continue;
> >
> > - if (pm_wakeup_pending()) {
> > +#ifdef CONFIG_PM_SLEEP
> > + if (!reboot && pm_wakeup_pending()) {
> > pr_info("Wakeup pending. Abort CPU freeze\n");
> > error = -EBUSY;
> > break;
> > }
> > +#endif
>
> Please avoid using #ifdefs in function bodies. This makes the code
> hard to maintain in the long term.
>
> >
> > trace_suspend_resume(TPS("CPU_OFF"), cpu, true);
> > error = _cpu_down(cpu, 1, CPUHP_OFFLINE);
> > @@ -1250,7 +1252,9 @@ int freeze_secondary_cpus(int primary)
> > cpumask_set_cpu(cpu, frozen_cpus);
> > else {
> > pr_err("Error taking CPU%d down: %d\n", cpu, error);
> > - break;
> > + /* When rebooting, offline as many CPUs as possible. */
> > + if (!reboot)
> > + break;
> > }
> > }
> >
> > diff --git a/kernel/reboot.c b/kernel/reboot.c
> > index c4d472b7f1b4..12f643b66e57 100644
> > --- a/kernel/reboot.c
> > +++ b/kernel/reboot.c
> > @@ -7,6 +7,7 @@
> >
> > #define pr_fmt(fmt) "reboot: " fmt
> >
> > +#include <linux/cpu.h>
> > #include <linux/ctype.h>
> > #include <linux/export.h>
> > #include <linux/kexec.h>
> > @@ -220,7 +221,9 @@ void migrate_to_reboot_cpu(void)
> > /* The boot cpu is always logical cpu 0 */
> > int cpu = reboot_cpu;
> >
> > +#if !IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_OFFLINE_CPUS_ON_REBOOT)
> > cpu_hotplug_disable();
> > +#endif
>
> You can write this as
>
> if (!IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_OFFLINE_CPUS_ON_REBOOT))
> cpu_hotplug_disable();
>
> That's what IS_ENABLED() is there for.
>
> >
> > /* Make certain the cpu I'm about to reboot on is online */
> > if (!cpu_online(cpu))
> > @@ -231,6 +234,11 @@ void migrate_to_reboot_cpu(void)
> >
> > /* Make certain I only run on the appropriate processor */
> > set_cpus_allowed_ptr(current, cpumask_of(cpu));
> > +
> > +#if IS_ENABLED(CONFIG_ARCH_OFFLINE_CPUS_ON_REBOOT)
> > + /* Offline other cpus if possible */
> > + freeze_secondary_cpus(cpu, true);
> > +#endif
>
> The above comment applies here too.
>
> > }
> >
> > /**
> > --
Powered by blists - more mailing lists