[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115121041.10863-3-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 12:12:10 +0000
From: Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH 02/65] staging: wfx: make hif_scan() usage clearer
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
hif_scan() return max number of jiffies to wait before the completion
indication. However, if this value is negative, an error has occurred.
Reword the code to reflect that behavior.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c | 7 +++----
1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 4 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
index 24061d09c404..9b3674b3226a 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/scan.c
@@ -56,10 +56,9 @@ static int send_scan_req(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
wfx_tx_lock_flush(wvif->wdev);
wvif->scan_abort = false;
reinit_completion(&wvif->scan_complete);
- ret = hif_scan(wvif, req, start_idx, i - start_idx);
- if (ret < 0)
- return ret;
- timeout = ret;
+ timeout = hif_scan(wvif, req, start_idx, i - start_idx);
+ if (timeout < 0)
+ return timeout;
ret = wait_for_completion_timeout(&wvif->scan_complete, timeout);
if (req->channels[start_idx]->max_power != wvif->wdev->output_power)
hif_set_output_power(wvif, wvif->wdev->output_power * 10);
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists