[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-Id: <8093D190-00C7-43A7-B63E-E06A80D20094@lca.pw>
Date: Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:38:39 -0500
From: Qian Cai <cai@....pw>
To: Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>
Cc: Michal Hocko <mhocko@...nel.org>,
David Hildenbrand <david@...hat.com>,
Sergey Senozhatsky <sergey.senozhatsky.work@...il.com>,
pmladek@...e.com, rostedt@...dmis.org, peterz@...radead.org,
linux-mm@...ck.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH -next] mm/hotplug: silence a lockdep splat with printk()
> On Jan 14, 2020, at 8:19 PM, Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org> wrote:
>
> On Tue, 14 Jan 2020 20:02:31 -0500 Qian Cai <cai@....pw> wrote:
>
>>
>>
>>>> @@ -8290,8 +8290,10 @@ bool has_unmovable_pages(struct zone *zo
>>>> return false;
>>>> unmovable:
>>>> WARN_ON_ONCE(zone_idx(zone) == ZONE_MOVABLE);
>>>> - if (flags & REPORT_FAILURE)
>>>> - dump_page(pfn_to_page(pfn + iter), reason);
>>>> + if (flags & REPORT_FAILURE) {
>>>> + page = pfn_to_page(pfn + iter);
>>>
>>> This statement appears to be unnecessary.
>>
>> dump_page() in set_migratetype_isolate() needs that “page”.
>
> local var `page' is never used after this statement.
>
The goal is to reuse the parameter of has_unmovable_pages((…, page, …)
as a return value, so after it returns, dump_page(page, ...) could use it. I
don’t see where it was defined as a local variable.
This is probably a bit too hacky, so I’ll change has_unmovable_pages()
to either return "struct page *” or NULL which is easier to understand.
Powered by blists - more mailing lists