linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: Fix out of bounds write in mpol_parse

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <CACT4Y+YF9kYEppMMg3oRkeo+OvhMS1hoKT6EqXCv1jRmA2dz3w@mail.gmail.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:57:47 +0100
From:   Dmitry Vyukov <dvyukov@...gle.com>
To:     Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
Cc:     Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Lee Schermerhorn <lee.schermerhorn@...com>,
        Linux-MM <linux-mm@...ck.org>,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        syzbot <syzbot+e64a13c5369a194d67df@...kaller.appspotmail.com>,
        Andrea Arcangeli <aarcange@...hat.com>,
        Hugh Dickins <hughd@...gle.com>,
        Michal Hocko <mhocko@...e.com>,
        syzkaller-bugs <syzkaller-bugs@...glegroups.com>,
        Al Viro <viro@...iv.linux.org.uk>, yang.shi@...ux.alibaba.com
Subject: Re: [PATCH] mm/mempolicy.c: Fix out of bounds write in mpol_parse_str()

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 1:54 PM Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz> wrote:
>
> On 1/15/20 6:54 AM, Dan Carpenter wrote:
> > What we are trying to do is change the '=' character to a NUL terminator
> > and then at the end of the function we restore it back to an '='.  The
> > problem is there are two error paths where we jump to the end of the
> > function before we have replaced the '=' with NUL.  We end up putting
> > the '=' in the wrong place (possibly one element before the start of
> > the buffer).
>
> Bleh.
>
> > Reported-by: syzbot+e64a13c5369a194d67df@...kaller.appspotmail.com
> > Fixes: 095f1fc4ebf3 ("mempolicy: rework shmem mpol parsing and display")
> > Signed-off-by: Dan Carpenter <dan.carpenter@...cle.com>
>
> Acked-by: Vlastimil Babka <vbabka@...e.cz>
>
> CC stable perhaps? Can this (tmpfs mount options parsing AFAICS?) become
> part of unprivileged operation in some scenarios?

Yes, tmpfs can be mounted by any user inside of a user namespace.
Also I suspect there are cases where an unprivileged attacker can
trick some utility to mount tmpfs on their behalf and provide their
own mount options.

> > ---
> >  mm/mempolicy.c | 6 +++---
> >  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 3 deletions(-)
> >
> > diff --git a/mm/mempolicy.c b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > index 067cf7d3daf5..1340c5c496b5 100644
> > --- a/mm/mempolicy.c
> > +++ b/mm/mempolicy.c
> > @@ -2817,6 +2817,9 @@ int mpol_parse_str(char *str, struct mempolicy **mpol)
> >       char *flags = strchr(str, '=');
> >       int err = 1, mode;
> >
> > +     if (flags)
> > +             *flags++ = '\0';        /* terminate mode string */
> > +
> >       if (nodelist) {
> >               /* NUL-terminate mode or flags string */
> >               *nodelist++ = '\0';
> > @@ -2827,9 +2830,6 @@ int mpol_parse_str(char *str, struct mempolicy **mpol)
> >       } else
> >               nodes_clear(nodes);
> >
> > -     if (flags)
> > -             *flags++ = '\0';        /* terminate mode string */
> > -
> >       mode = match_string(policy_modes, MPOL_MAX, str);
> >       if (mode < 0)
> >               goto out;
> >
>
> --
> You received this message because you are subscribed to the Google Groups "syzkaller-bugs" group.
> To unsubscribe from this group and stop receiving emails from it, send an email to syzkaller-bugs+unsubscribe@...glegroups.com.
> To view this discussion on the web visit https://groups.google.com/d/msgid/syzkaller-bugs/d31f6069-bda7-2cdb-b770-0c9cddac7537%40suse.cz.