linux-kernel - Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: get rid of var ret and out jump label in kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <728a5ea123bf6f55b1653e4ccac76175@kernel.org>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:58:56 +0000
From:   Marc Zyngier <maz@...nel.org>
To:     linmiaohe <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
Cc:     pbonzini@...hat.com, rkrcmar@...hat.com, james.morse@....com,
        julien.thierry.kdev@...il.com, suzuki.poulose@....com,
        christoffer.dall@....com, catalin.marinas@....com,
        eric.auger@...hat.com, gregkh@...uxfoundation.org, will@...nel.org,
        andre.przywara@....com, tglx@...utronix.de,
        linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org, kvmarm@...ts.cs.columbia.edu,
        linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org, kvm@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] KVM: arm64: get rid of var ret and out jump label in
 kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug()

On 2020-01-14 02:20, linmiaohe wrote:
> Friendly ping :)

Friendly reply:

>> From: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>> 
>> The var ret and out jump label is not really needed. Clean them up.
>> Signed-off-by: Miaohe Lin <linmiaohe@...wei.com>
>> ---
>>  arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c | 11 +++--------
>>  1 file changed, 3 insertions(+), 8 deletions(-)
>> 
>> diff --git a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c index 
>> 2fff06114a8f..3b836c91609e 100644
>> --- a/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
>> +++ b/arch/arm64/kvm/guest.c
>> @@ -834,14 +834,10 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_translate(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,  int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  					struct kvm_guest_debug *dbg)
>>  {
>> -	int ret = 0;
>> -
>>  	trace_kvm_set_guest_debug(vcpu, dbg->control);
>> 
>> -	if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK) {
>> -		ret = -EINVAL;
>> -		goto out;
>> -	}
>> +	if (dbg->control & ~KVM_GUESTDBG_VALID_MASK)
>> +		return -EINVAL;
>> 
>>  	if (dbg->control & KVM_GUESTDBG_ENABLE) {
>>  		vcpu->guest_debug = dbg->control;
>> @@ -856,8 +852,7 @@ int kvm_arch_vcpu_ioctl_set_guest_debug(struct 
>> kvm_vcpu *vcpu,
>>  		vcpu->guest_debug = 0;
>>  	}
>> 
>> -out:
>> -	return ret;
>> +	return 0;

I don't think there is anything wrong with the existing code.
It may not be to your own taste, but is in keeping with a lot
of the KVM code.

If you were making changes to this code, I wouldn't object.
But on its own, this is just churn.

Thanks,

         M.
-- 
Jazz is not dead. It just smells funny...