[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115135338.14374-8-Jerome.Pouiller@silabs.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 13:54:12 +0000
From: Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
To: "devel@...verdev.osuosl.org" <devel@...verdev.osuosl.org>,
"linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org" <linux-wireless@...r.kernel.org>
CC: "netdev@...r.kernel.org" <netdev@...r.kernel.org>,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
Greg Kroah-Hartman <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>,
Kalle Valo <kvalo@...eaurora.org>,
"David S . Miller" <davem@...emloft.net>,
Jérôme Pouiller <Jerome.Pouiller@...abs.com>
Subject: [PATCH v2 07/65] staging: wfx: simplify hif_set_rcpi_rssi_threshold()
usage
From: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
The structure hif_mib_rcpi_rssi_threshold come from hardware API. It is
not intended to be manipulated in upper layers of the driver.
In add, current code for hif_set_rcpi_rssi_threshold() is dumb. It
should pack data using the hardware representation instead of leaving
all work to the caller.
Signed-off-by: Jérôme Pouiller <jerome.pouiller@...abs.com>
---
drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.h | 19 +++++++++++++++++--
drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c | 26 ++------------------------
2 files changed, 19 insertions(+), 26 deletions(-)
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.h b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.h
index 749df67131c3..a8082508fbfd 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.h
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/hif_tx_mib.h
@@ -44,10 +44,25 @@ static inline int hif_set_beacon_wakeup_period(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
}
static inline int hif_set_rcpi_rssi_threshold(struct wfx_vif *wvif,
- struct hif_mib_rcpi_rssi_threshold *arg)
+ int rssi_thold, int rssi_hyst)
{
+ struct hif_mib_rcpi_rssi_threshold arg = {
+ .rolling_average_count = 8,
+ .detection = 1,
+ };
+
+ if (!rssi_thold && !rssi_hyst) {
+ arg.upperthresh = 1;
+ arg.lowerthresh = 1;
+ } else {
+ arg.upper_threshold = rssi_thold + rssi_hyst;
+ arg.upper_threshold = (arg.upper_threshold + 110) * 2;
+ arg.lower_threshold = rssi_thold;
+ arg.lower_threshold = (arg.lower_threshold + 110) * 2;
+ }
+
return hif_write_mib(wvif->wdev, wvif->id,
- HIF_MIB_ID_RCPI_RSSI_THRESHOLD, arg, sizeof(*arg));
+ HIF_MIB_ID_RCPI_RSSI_THRESHOLD, &arg, sizeof(arg));
}
static inline int hif_get_counters_table(struct wfx_dev *wdev,
diff --git a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
index 11e33a6d5bb5..339acbce96fb 100644
--- a/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
+++ b/drivers/staging/wfx/sta.c
@@ -1033,31 +1033,9 @@ void wfx_bss_info_changed(struct ieee80211_hw *hw,
hif_slot_time(wvif, info->use_short_slot ? 9 : 20);
if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_ASSOC || changed & BSS_CHANGED_CQM) {
- struct hif_mib_rcpi_rssi_threshold th = {
- .rolling_average_count = 8,
- .detection = 1,
- };
-
wvif->cqm_rssi_thold = info->cqm_rssi_thold;
-
- if (!info->cqm_rssi_thold && !info->cqm_rssi_hyst) {
- th.upperthresh = 1;
- th.lowerthresh = 1;
- } else {
- /* FIXME It's not a correct way of setting threshold.
- * Upper and lower must be set equal here and adjusted
- * in callback. However current implementation is much
- * more reliable and stable.
- */
- /* RSSI: signed Q8.0, RCPI: unsigned Q7.1
- * RSSI = RCPI / 2 - 110
- */
- th.upper_threshold = info->cqm_rssi_thold + info->cqm_rssi_hyst;
- th.upper_threshold = (th.upper_threshold + 110) * 2;
- th.lower_threshold = info->cqm_rssi_thold;
- th.lower_threshold = (th.lower_threshold + 110) * 2;
- }
- hif_set_rcpi_rssi_threshold(wvif, &th);
+ hif_set_rcpi_rssi_threshold(wvif, info->cqm_rssi_thold,
+ info->cqm_rssi_hyst);
}
if (changed & BSS_CHANGED_TXPOWER &&
--
2.25.0
Powered by blists - more mailing lists