[<prev] [next>] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <20200115142027.56960-1-yuehaibing@huawei.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 22:20:27 +0800
From: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
To: <clm@...com>, <josef@...icpanda.com>, <dsterba@...e.com>,
<nborisov@...e.com>
CC: <linux-btrfs@...r.kernel.org>, <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
Subject: [PATCH -next] btrfs: Fix return value while kcalloc fails in btrfs_rmap_block
In btrfs_rmap_block(), if kcalloc fails, it should return
-ENOMEM instead of 0.
Fixes: 767f58cdaf20 ("btrfs: Refactor btrfs_rmap_block to improve readability")
Signed-off-by: YueHaibing <yuehaibing@...wei.com>
---
fs/btrfs/block-group.c | 2 +-
1 file changed, 1 insertion(+), 1 deletion(-)
diff --git a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
index 8877af5..1485158 100644
--- a/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
+++ b/fs/btrfs/block-group.c
@@ -1655,7 +1655,7 @@ int btrfs_rmap_block(struct btrfs_fs_info *fs_info, u64 chunk_start,
*stripe_len = io_stripe_size;
out:
free_extent_map(em);
- return 0;
+ return ret;
}
static int exclude_super_stripes(struct btrfs_block_group *cache)
--
2.7.4
Powered by blists - more mailing lists