lists.openwall.net   lists  /  announce  owl-users  owl-dev  john-users  john-dev  passwdqc-users  yescrypt  popa3d-users  /  oss-security  kernel-hardening  musl  sabotage  tlsify  passwords  /  crypt-dev  xvendor  /  Bugtraq  Full-Disclosure  linux-kernel  linux-netdev  linux-ext4  linux-hardening  linux-cve-announce  PHC 
Open Source and information security mailing list archives
 
Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.
[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 15:42:42 +0100
From:   Andrey Konovalov <andreyknvl@...gle.com>
To:     Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com>
Cc:     Arnd Bergmann <arnd@...db.de>,
        Khalid Aziz <khalid.aziz@...cle.com>,
        Andrew Morton <akpm@...ux-foundation.org>,
        Peter Zijlstra <peterz@...radead.org>,
        Christian Brauner <christian.brauner@...ntu.com>,
        Kees Cook <keescook@...omium.org>,
        Ingo Molnar <mingo@...nel.org>,
        Aleksa Sarai <cyphar@...har.com>,
        Linus Torvalds <torvalds@...ux-foundation.org>,
        linux-snps-arc@...ts.infradead.org,
        LKML <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        linux-arch <linux-arch@...r.kernel.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC 2/4] lib/strncpy_from_user: Remove redundant user space
 pointer range check

On Tue, Jan 14, 2020 at 9:08 PM Vineet Gupta <Vineet.Gupta1@...opsys.com> wrote:
>
> This came up when switching ARC to word-at-a-time interface and using
> generic/optimized strncpy_from_user
>
> It seems the existing code checks for user buffer/string range multiple
> times and one of tem cn be avoided.
>
> There's an open-coded range check which computes @max off of user_addr_max()
> and thus typically way larger than the kernel buffer @count and subsequently
> discarded in do_strncpy_from_user()
>
>         if (max > count)
>                 max = count;
>
> The canonical user_access_begin() => access_ok() follow anyways and even
> with @count it should suffice for an intial range check as is true for
> any copy_{to,from}_user()
>
> And in case actual user space buffer is smaller than kernel dest pointer
> (i.e. @max < @count) the usual string copy, null byte detection would
> abort the process early anyways
>
> Signed-off-by: Vineet Gupta <vgupta@...opsys.com>
> ---
>  lib/strncpy_from_user.c | 36 +++++++++++-------------------------
>  lib/strnlen_user.c      | 28 +++++++---------------------
>  2 files changed, 18 insertions(+), 46 deletions(-)
>
> diff --git a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
> index dccb95af6003..a1622d71f037 100644
> --- a/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
> +++ b/lib/strncpy_from_user.c
> @@ -21,22 +21,15 @@
>  /*
>   * Do a strncpy, return length of string without final '\0'.
>   * 'count' is the user-supplied count (return 'count' if we
> - * hit it), 'max' is the address space maximum (and we return
> - * -EFAULT if we hit it).
> + * hit it). If access fails, return -EFAULT.
>   */
>  static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
> -                                       unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
> +                                       unsigned long count)
>  {
>         const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
> +       unsigned long max = count;
>         unsigned long res = 0;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Truncate 'max' to the user-specified limit, so that
> -        * we only have one limit we need to check in the loop
> -        */
> -       if (max > count)
> -               max = count;
> -
>         if (IS_UNALIGNED(src, dst))
>                 goto byte_at_a_time;
>
> @@ -72,7 +65,7 @@ static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
>          * Uhhuh. We hit 'max'. But was that the user-specified maximum
>          * too? If so, that's ok - we got as much as the user asked for.
>          */
> -       if (res >= count)
> +       if (res == count)
>                 return res;
>
>         /*
> @@ -103,25 +96,18 @@ static inline long do_strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src,
>   */
>  long strncpy_from_user(char *dst, const char __user *src, long count)
>  {
> -       unsigned long max_addr, src_addr;
> -
>         if (unlikely(count <= 0))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       max_addr = user_addr_max();
> -       src_addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(src);

If you end up changing this code, you need to keep the untagged_addr()
logic, otherwise this breaks arm64 tagged address ABI [1].

[1] https://www.kernel.org/doc/html/latest/arm64/tagged-address-abi.html

> -       if (likely(src_addr < max_addr)) {
> -               unsigned long max = max_addr - src_addr;
> +       kasan_check_write(dst, count);
> +       check_object_size(dst, count, false);
> +       if (user_access_begin(src, count)) {
>                 long retval;
> -
> -               kasan_check_write(dst, count);
> -               check_object_size(dst, count, false);
> -               if (user_access_begin(src, max)) {
> -                       retval = do_strncpy_from_user(dst, src, count, max);
> -                       user_access_end();
> -                       return retval;
> -               }
> +               retval = do_strncpy_from_user(dst, src, count);
> +               user_access_end();
> +               return retval;
>         }
> +
>         return -EFAULT;
>  }
>  EXPORT_SYMBOL(strncpy_from_user);
> diff --git a/lib/strnlen_user.c b/lib/strnlen_user.c
> index 6c0005d5dd5c..5ce61f303d6e 100644
> --- a/lib/strnlen_user.c
> +++ b/lib/strnlen_user.c
> @@ -20,19 +20,13 @@
>   * if it fits in a aligned 'long'. The caller needs to check
>   * the return value against "> max".
>   */
> -static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count, unsigned long max)
> +static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count)
>  {
>         const struct word_at_a_time constants = WORD_AT_A_TIME_CONSTANTS;
>         unsigned long align, res = 0;
> +       unsigned long max = count;
>         unsigned long c;
>
> -       /*
> -        * Truncate 'max' to the user-specified limit, so that
> -        * we only have one limit we need to check in the loop
> -        */
> -       if (max > count)
> -               max = count;
> -
>         /*
>          * Do everything aligned. But that means that we
>          * need to also expand the maximum..
> @@ -64,7 +58,7 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count,
>          * Uhhuh. We hit 'max'. But was that the user-specified maximum
>          * too? If so, return the marker for "too long".
>          */
> -       if (res >= count)
> +       if (res == count)
>                 return count+1;
>
>         /*
> @@ -98,22 +92,14 @@ static inline long do_strnlen_user(const char __user *src, unsigned long count,
>   */
>  long strnlen_user(const char __user *str, long count)
>  {
> -       unsigned long max_addr, src_addr;
> -
>         if (unlikely(count <= 0))
>                 return 0;
>
> -       max_addr = user_addr_max();
> -       src_addr = (unsigned long)untagged_addr(str);
> -       if (likely(src_addr < max_addr)) {
> -               unsigned long max = max_addr - src_addr;
> +       if (user_access_begin(str, count)) {
>                 long retval;
> -
> -               if (user_access_begin(str, max)) {
> -                       retval = do_strnlen_user(str, count, max);
> -                       user_access_end();
> -                       return retval;
> -               }
> +               retval = do_strnlen_user(str, count);
> +               user_access_end();
> +               return retval;
>         }
>         return 0;
>  }
> --
> 2.20.1
>

Powered by blists - more mailing lists

Powered by Openwall GNU/*/Linux Powered by OpenVZ