[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <CAL_JsqJD4CY6P+76pM69-4UPpTC+pE5BmyCm+gWhCA-Dd1YB4A@mail.gmail.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:03:52 -0600
From: Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To: Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc: Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
"heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
"linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
"moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE"
<linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
"open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: combine common mmc and
dw-mshc properties
On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:02 AM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I was not aware that was playing.
> So now we go from a 'simple' txt to yaml conversion to a complete
> 'change your node name first' operation.
You only need to update the examples, not all the dts files for now.
> Can you indicate if that common yaml file for dw-mshc and Rockchip
> is still a good idea?
Yes, that's fine.
Rob
Powered by blists - more mailing lists