linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: combine common mmc and dw-mshc properties

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 09:03:52 -0600
From:   Rob Herring <robh+dt@...nel.org>
To:     Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com>
Cc:     Ulf Hansson <ulf.hansson@...aro.org>,
        Mark Rutland <mark.rutland@....com>,
        "heiko@...ech.de" <heiko@...ech.de>,
        linux-mmc <linux-mmc@...r.kernel.org>,
        devicetree@...r.kernel.org,
        "linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org" <linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org>,
        "moderated list:ARM/FREESCALE IMX / MXC ARM ARCHITECTURE" 
        <linux-arm-kernel@...ts.infradead.org>,
        "open list:ARM/Rockchip SoC..." <linux-rockchip@...ts.infradead.org>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH v1 1/3] dt-bindings: mmc: combine common mmc and
 dw-mshc properties

On Wed, Jan 15, 2020 at 7:02 AM Johan Jonker <jbx6244@...il.com> wrote:
>
> Hi,
>
> Thank you for your explanation.
> I was not aware that was playing.
> So now we go from a 'simple' txt to yaml conversion to a complete
> 'change your node name first' operation.

You only need to update the examples, not all the dts files for now.

> Can you indicate if that common yaml file for dw-mshc and Rockchip
> is still a good idea?

Yes, that's fine.

Rob