[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [day] [month] [year] [list]
Message-ID: <76ebce76-6f24-c4c4-f067-3989a2c41710@samsung.com>
Date: Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:09:06 +0100
From: Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz <b.zolnierkie@...sung.com>
To: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
Cc: Jaya Kumar <jayalk@...works.biz>, dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org,
linux-fbdev@...r.kernel.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org
Subject: Re: [PATCH] video: fbdev: arcfb: add missed free_irq
On 11/16/19 4:44 PM, Chuhong Yuan wrote:
> The driver forgets to free irq in remove which is requested in
> probe.
> Add the missed call to fix it.
>
> Signed-off-by: Chuhong Yuan <hslester96@...il.com>
> ---
> drivers/video/fbdev/arcfb.c | 3 +++
> 1 file changed, 3 insertions(+)
>
> diff --git a/drivers/video/fbdev/arcfb.c b/drivers/video/fbdev/arcfb.c
> index a48741aab240..7aed01f001a4 100644
> --- a/drivers/video/fbdev/arcfb.c
> +++ b/drivers/video/fbdev/arcfb.c
> @@ -590,8 +590,11 @@ static int arcfb_probe(struct platform_device *dev)
> static int arcfb_remove(struct platform_device *dev)
> {
> struct fb_info *info = platform_get_drvdata(dev);
> + struct arcfb_par *par = info->par;
>
> if (info) {
> + if (irq)
> + free_irq(par->irq, info);
> unregister_framebuffer(info);
We cannot free IRQ while framebuffer is registered (as we can
deadlock in arcfb_ioctl()).
Also it seems that ordering in the probe function is wrong
(it should not request IRQ or initialize the hardware after
registering framebuffer).
> vfree((void __force *)info->screen_base);
> framebuffer_release(info);
Best regards,
--
Bartlomiej Zolnierkiewicz
Samsung R&D Institute Poland
Samsung Electronics
Powered by blists - more mailing lists