linux-kernel - Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gvt: move public gvt headers out into global include

lists.openwall.net		lists / announce owl-users owl-dev john-users john-dev passwdqc-users yescrypt popa3d-users / oss-security kernel-hardening musl sabotage tlsify passwords / crypt-dev xvendor / Bugtraq Full-Disclosure linux-kernel linux-netdev linux-ext4 linux-hardening linux-cve-announce PHC
Open Source and information security mailing list archives

Hash Suite: Windows password security audit tool. GUI, reports in PDF.

[<prev] [next>] [<thread-prev] [thread-next>] [day] [month] [year] [list]

Message-ID: <20200115152215.GA3830321@kroah.com>
Date:   Wed, 15 Jan 2020 16:22:15 +0100
From:   Greg KH <gregkh@...uxfoundation.org>
To:     Julian Stecklina <julian.stecklina@...erus-technology.de>
Cc:     intel-gvt-dev@...ts.freedesktop.org,
        dri-devel@...ts.freedesktop.org, linux-kernel@...r.kernel.org,
        zhiyuan.lv@...el.com, hang.yuan@...el.com,
        Zhenyu Wang <zhenyuw@...ux.intel.com>
Subject: Re: [RFC PATCH 4/4] drm/i915/gvt: move public gvt headers out into
 global include

On Thu, Jan 09, 2020 at 07:13:57PM +0200, Julian Stecklina wrote:
> Now that the GVT interface to hypervisors does not depend on i915/GVT
> internals anymore, we can move the headers to the global include/.
> 
> This makes out-of-tree modules for hypervisor integration possible.

What kind of out-of-tree modules do you need/want for this?  And why do
they somehow have to be out of the tree?  We want them in the tree, and
so should you, as it will save you time and money if they are.

Also, as Christoph said, adding exports for functions that are not used
by anything within the kernel tree itself is not ok, that's not how we
work.

thanks,

greg k-h